AI Coding Assistants Secretly Copying All Code to China
Thereโs a new report about two AI coding assistants, used by 1.5 million developers, that are surreptitiously sending a copy of everything they ingest to China.
Maybe avoid using them.
Thereโs a new report about two AI coding assistants, used by 1.5 million developers, that are surreptitiously sending a copy of everything they ingest to China.
Maybe avoid using them.
Security leaders share how artificial intelligence is changing malware, ransomware, and identity-led intrusions, and how defenses must evolve.
The post Cyber Insights 2026: Malware and Cyberattacks in the Age of AI appeared first on SecurityWeek.
From an Anthropic blog post:
In a recent evaluation of AI modelsโ cyber capabilities, current Claude models can now succeed at multistage attacks on networks with dozens of hosts using only standard, open-source tools, instead of the custom tools needed by previous generations. This illustrates how barriers to the use of AI in relatively autonomous cyber workflows are rapidly coming down, and highlights the importance of security fundamentals like promptly patching known vulnerabilities.
[โฆ]
A notable development during the testing of Claude Sonnet 4.5 is that the model can now succeed on a minority of the networks without the custom cyber toolkit needed by previous generations. In particular, Sonnet 4.5 can now exfiltrate all of the (simulated) personal information in a high-fidelity simulation of the Equifax data breachโone of the costliest cyber attacks in historyยญยญusing only a Bash shell on a widely-available Kali Linux host (standard, open-source tools for penetration testing; not a custom toolkit). Sonnet 4.5 accomplishes this by instantly recognizing a publicized CVE and writing code to exploit it without needing to look it up or iterate on it. Recalling that the original Equifax breach happened by exploiting a publicized CVE that had not yet been patched, the prospect of highly competent and fast AI agents leveraging this approach underscores the pressing need for security best practices like prompt updates and patches.
AI models are getting better at this faster than I expected. This will be a major power shift in cybersecurity.
Russia's current isolation from the Olympics may lead to increased cyberthreats targeting the 2026 Winter Games. We discuss the potential threat picture.
The post Understanding the Russian Cyberthreat to the 2026 Winter Olympics appeared first on Unit 42.

Meta plans to test exclusive features that will be incorporated in paid versions of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. It confirmed these plans to TechCrunch.
But these plans are not to be confused with the ad-free subscription options that Meta introduced for Facebook and Instagram in the EU, the European Economic Area, and Switzerland in late 2023 and framed as a way to comply with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Digital Markets Act requirements.
From November 2023, users in those regions could either keep using the services for free with personalized ads or pay a monthly fee for an adโfree experience. European rules require Meta to get usersโ consent in order to show them targeted ads, so this was an obvious attempt to recoup advertising revenue when users declined to give that consent.
This year, users in the UK were given the same choice: use Metaโs products for free or subscribe to use them without ads. But only grudgingly, judging by the tone in the offerโฆ โAs part of laws in your region, you have a choice.โ

That ad-free option, however, is not what Meta is talking about now.
The newly announced plans are not about ads, and they are also separate from Meta Verified, which starts at around $15 a month and focuses on creators and businesses, offering a verification badge, better support, and antiโimpersonation protection.
Instead, these new subscriptions are likely to focus on additional featuresโmore control over how users share and connect, and possibly tools such as expanded AI capabilities, unlimited audience lists, seeing who you follow that doesnโt follow you back, or viewing stories without the poster knowing it was you.
These examples are unconfirmed. All we know for sure is that Meta plans to test new paid features to see which ones users are willing to pay for and how much they can charge.
Meta has said these features will focus on productivity, creativity, and expanded AI.
Unfortunately, this feels like another refusal to listen.
Most of us arenโt asking for more AI in our feeds. Weโre asking for a basic sense of control: control over who sees us, whatโs tracked about us, and how our data is used to feed an algorithm designed to keep us scrolling.
Users shouldnโt have to choose between being mined for behavioral data or paying a monthly fee just to be left alone. The message baked into โpay or be profiledโ is that privacy is now a luxury good, not a default right. But while regulators keep saying the model is unlawful, the experience on the ground still nudges people toward the path of least resistance: accept the tracking and move on.
Even then, this level of choice is only available to users in Europe.
Why not offer the same option to users in the US? Or will it take stronger US privacy regulation to make that happen?
We donโt just report on threats โ we help protect your social media
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by usingย Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.
An LLMjacking operation has been targeting exposed LLMs and MCPs at scale, for commercial monetization.
The post LLMs Hijacked, Monetized in โOperation Bizarre Bazaarโ appeared first on SecurityWeek.
The announcement comes just weeks after Palo Alto Networks and Google Cloud announced a multibillion-dollar AI and cloud security deal.
The post PwC and Google Cloud Ink $400 Million Deal to Scale AI-Powered Defense appeared first on SecurityWeek.
Researchers discovered 16 malicious browser extensions for Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge that steal ChatGPT session tokens, giving attackers access to accounts, including conversation history and metadata.
The 16 malicious extensions (15 for Chrome and 1 for Edge) claim to improve and optimize ChatGPT, but instead siphon usersโ session tokens to attackers. Together, they have been downloaded around 900 times, a relatively small number compared to other malicious extensions.
Despite benign descriptions and, in some cases, a โfeaturedโ badge, the real goal of these extensions is to hijack ChatGPT identities by stealing session authentication tokens and sending them to attacker-controlled backends.
Possession of these tokens gives attackers the same level of access as the user, including conversation history and metadata.
In addition to your ChatGPT session token, the extensions also send extra details about themselves (such as their version and language settings), along with information about how theyโre used, and special keys they get from their own online service.
Taken together, this allows the attackers to build a picture of who you are and how you work online. They can use it to keep recognizing you over time, build a profile of your behavior, and maintain access to your ChatGPT-connected services for much longer. This increases the privacy impact and means a single compromised extension can cause broader harm if its servers are abused or breached.
According to the researchers, this campaign coincides with a broader trend:
โTheย rapid growth in adoption of AI-powered browser extensions, aimed at helping users with their everyday productivity needs. While most of them are completely benign, many of these extensions mimic known brands to gain usersโ trust, particularly those designed to enhance interaction with large language models.โ
Although we always advise people to install extensions only from official web stores, this case proves once again that not all extensions available there are safe. That said, installing extensions from outside official web stores carries an even higher risk.
Extensions listed in official stores undergo aย review processย before being approved. This process, which combines automated and manual checks, assesses the extensionโs safety, policy compliance, and overall user experience. The goal is to protect users from scams, malware, and other malicious activity. However, this review process is not foolproof.
Microsoft and Google have been notified about the abuse. However, extensions that are already installed may remain active in Chrome and Edge until users manually remove them.
These are the browser extensions you should remove. They are listed by Name โ Publisher โ Extension ID:
We donโt just report on threatsโwe remove them
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices byย downloading Malwarebytes today.