Fortnite scam pages like the ones below appear by the dozen every day, recycled endlessly under different names and designs.
One version promises $50 from a fake superhero collaboration. Another claims it can calculate what your locker is worth. Both lead to the same destination: a fake Epic Games login page designed to steal your account. It’s an old trick, but it still catches people out.
The short version
If a website promises free V-Bucks, cash, or a tool to calculate your locker’s value, then asks you to log in with your Epic account to get it, it’s not run by Epic.
Epic doesn’t offer an official tool that values accounts, and no legitimate giveaway requires you to sign in through a third-party site. You’re just handing your Epic username and password to scammers.
If you or your child entered your Epic login details on one of these sites, assume the account has been compromised. Change the password immediately, turn on two-factor authentication, and don’t reuse that password on any other accounts.
Why do they want your login?
A stolen Fortnite account can be worth real money. Criminals can take over accounts with rare skins, spend any saved payment methods, sell the account on underground marketplaces, or use it to scam the owner’s friends. They may also try the same username and password on other online accounts, hoping the password has been reused.
Why Fortnite?
Fortnite still attracts around 110 million monthly players and has more than 650 million registered accounts. That alone makes it an attractive target for cybercriminals.
The audience’s age matters too. In December 2022, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) fined Epic Games a record $520 million, after alleging that the company knew children made up a substantial share of its player base and left voice and text chat turned on by default, exposing them to strangers. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) also cites industry experts who say young gamers are especially vulnerable to phishing because they spend more time on social media and are less familiar with social engineering.
The game is also built around visible status. Skins, emotes, and pickaxes cost real money, making the idea that “your locker has a price” feel plausible. Rare or discontinued skins really do sell for hundreds of dollars on unofficial marketplaces, even though Epic offers no official way to cash out V-Bucks and selling accounts violates its terms of service. That kernel of truth is exactly what these locker-value scams exploit.
That’s also what makes them more convincing than a simple V-Bucks giveaway. Instead of promising something for nothing, they play on curiosity about something the player already owns. That’s probably why this version keeps coming back.
How the scam works
Some pages promise rewards:
Others skip the free-reward pitch and frame the locker itself as hidden value the player is owed:
Others frame it as competition instead of currency:
The hook changes, but the fake login page doesn’t. These sites all do the same thing. They ask you to sign in with your Epic account so they can steal your username and password.
Another variant: Fake settlement claims
This one borrows a real story. Epic did settle with the FTC for $520 million, and real payments are still going out in 2026. But the real settlement pays actual dollars through the FTC’s own process, not in-game V-Bucks through an “Epic Games Locker,” and the claim window closed in July 2025.
References to an “EU Regulatory Mandate” and the case number shown on these pages don’t match any genuine legal action.
How to stay safe
Fortnite scams change constantly, but the advice doesn’t.
Use Malwarebytes Browser Guard to block known phishing sites before they have a chance to steal your login details.
Only sign in to your Epic account at epicgames.com. If another website asks for your Epic login, leave.
Be sceptical of offers that sound too good to be true. Free V-Bucks, locker valuations, and surprise rewards are all common phishing lures.
Verify refunds and settlements on the official source. If a page claims you’re owed money, check the regulator’s website yourself instead of following its links.
Turn on two-factor authentication (2FA). It can stop attackers from accessing your account even if they steal your password.
Use Malwarebytes Scam Guard. It can help you identify suspicious links and messages before you click.
What to do if you clicked
Change the Epic password immediately, going directly to epicgames.com, not through the suspicious link.
Turn on two-factor authentication if you haven’t already.
Check your linked email for password reset requests or login alerts you didn’t make.
Review connected devices/services on the account and remove anything unfamiliar.
If you entered payment details anywhere, contact your card issuer and monitor your statements.
Report the page to Epic’s support and flag it as phishing in your browser.
If the page claims to be part of a settlement or refund, verify it on the regulator’s official website. For the Epic settlement, that’s ftc.gov.
Stop threats before they can do any harm.
Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocks phishing pages and malicious sites automatically. Free, one click to install. Add it to your browser →
Researchers have described a campaign that delivers a remote access Trojan (RAT) called AtlasRAT through a fake Flash Player installer.
People still go looking for “Flash player” because a surprising amount of content and software was built around Flash and never properly migrated. Users often just want a quick way to get those old sites, games, or business apps working again.
The underlying problem is that Adobe ended support for Flash Player on December 31, 2020, and actively blocks Flash content from running in the official player.
Attackers know some people will still search for Flash to run a game or a business app, so they wrap their malware in a fake Flash‑related installer that looks familiar and legitimate.
That’s likely why the AtlasRAT infection chain starts with a Delphi executable named FlashPlay.Exe, masquerading as an “AGE Flash Player” installer. The first-stage loader runs entirely in memory and reconstructs additional payloads instead of dropping obvious files to disk, a technique often referred to as fileless malware.
The final payload (MainDll.Dll) uses a self‑signed certificate spoofing CN=update.Microsoft.Com to initialize Transport Layer Security (TLS) client communication and encrypts Command and Control (C2) traffic.
A self‑signed certificate means the owner signs with their own key instead of a trusted certificate authority (CA). That means an attacker can create a certificate claiming to be update.microsoft.com or google.com, even though they don’t control those domains. A web browser would reject such a certificate with a warning. Custom malware, however, can simply ignore the operating system’s trust checks and use it to set up encrypted C2.
Once AtlasRAT is installed, the operator gains long‑term remote control of the infected Windows system with capabilities including:
Collecting credentials via offline keylogging
Gathering system information and identifying installed security products
Exfiltrating data over encrypted channels
Injecting DLLs into applications like WeChat, potentially allowing the attacker to monitor or manipulate messaging, or to hide malware activity or connectivity.
Based on historical data, the researchers suspect that AtlasRAT is a reusable framework or commercial offering rather than a one-off tool used by a single group.
How to stay safe
When looking for apps and software to perform a specific task, remember that cybercriminals often exploit popular searches in semi-targeted attacks. In previous campaigns, for example, AtlasRAT has also been distributed as a fake VPN installer.
Some tips to keep this RAT, and others, off your computer:
Carefully check what you’re about to install. Sponsored search results are not a guarantee that software is legitimate.
A whole industry has sprung up around selling TikTok “growth.”
Cheap views by the hundred, pre-made ad accounts, and polished sales pages promising a repeatable path to serious revenue.
None of it is officially sanctioned by TikTok, and depending on what you’re buying, you could end up wasting money, losing your account, or handing your login details to scammers.
Scam 1: Sites selling cheap likes and engagement
Sites selling bulk engagement all look remarkably similar.
They offer small bundles of views, likes, or followers for a few pounds, usually alongside identical packages for YouTube, Instagram, and other platforms.
The sales pitch is almost always the same: “100% real profiles,” “no bots, no click farms,” and “completely safe.”
Those claims are worth reading carefully because they’re addressing the biggest concern buyers already have.
At this price point, bulk engagement is usually generated through bots, click farms, or other artificial means—the very thing these sites insist they don’t use.
Even if your engagement numbers increase initially, TikTok’s fraud detection systems can remove artificial engagement, and accounts that repeatedly use these services risk being flagged or restricted.
Scam 2: The “aged” ad account marketplace
Another common offer is bulk TikTok Ads accounts sold as “aged” or “trusted,” often bundled with a replacement guarantee if an account stops working. The pitch is that you skip the hassle of setting up and verifying a new advertising account.
The problem is that you don’t know how those accounts were created. Many are built using stolen or synthetic identities, compromised payment details, or other deceptive methods. Buying one means inheriting that history—and the very real risk that TikTok detects it and suspends the account, along with any campaigns or ad budget attached to it. A replacement guarantee won’t help if your advertising is suddenly brought to a halt.
Scam 3: The growth framework
A third type of offer is less obviously a scam and more of a marketing funnel.
Slick landing pages—often hosted on free platforms and paired with an embedded video—promise a “proven blueprint” for turning TikTok into a major source of income, usually backed by impressive but unverifiable claims about past clients.
The immediate goal is usually to collect your email address, and sometimes your phone number, before revealing what’s actually for sale. That might be a paid course, a “done-for-you” management service, or a request for direct access to your TikTok Shop or Ads account.
What happens next varies, but the common thread is the same: you’re being asked to trust an unverified third party with your business, your money, or your account.
What you’re really signing up for
Not every TikTok marketing service is a scam. But if someone’s offering thousands of views for a few pounds, bulk “aged” ad accounts, or guaranteed growth, you’re in a very different part of the market.
These services promise shortcuts. What they often deliver is fake engagement, accounts with questionable histories, or requests for access to your own account.
At best, you’ve wasted your money on engagement TikTok later strips away. At worst, you’re buying an account built on stolen information or giving an untrusted third party full access to your own.
Our advice
Don’t pay for views, likes, or followers. Artificial engagement isn’t real growth and can put your account at risk under TikTok’s rules.
Never share your TikTok username and password with a “boosting” service, regardless of how it’s presented.
Don’t buy or sell TikTok Ads or Business accounts outside TikTok’s own account creation process.
Treat “guaranteed revenue” frameworks and courses like any other business opportunity: they’re sales pages first, educational content second.
None of this is unique to TikTok. The platform’s explosive growth has simply given a familiar ecosystem of low-effort scams a new audience.
Scammers don’t need to hack you. They just need you to click once.
Shoppers browsing on their phones are landing on convincing Walmart lookalike sites offering name-brand liquor at 40% to 70% off, only to be led straight to a checkout page asking for a full credit card number, expiry date, and CVV.
The sites have no connection to Walmart. They’re part of a network of more than 120 near-identical domains built to look like a legitimate retailer just long enough to steal your card details.
Fake Walmart websites
The name “Walmart” is doing most of the work here. It’s one of the most recognized retailers in the world, and it’s that familiarity that makes people lower their guard. A shopper who’d hesitate on an unfamiliar website may think nothing of an unusually large discount because the logo, colours, and layout look familiar.
That trust hasn’t been earned by the site. It’s borrowed from a brand that has nothing to do with it.
If you’ve entered your card details on one of these pages, the safest assumption is that your card has been compromised.
How the scam works
The scam follows a simple pattern: a Walmart-branded homepage, category pages stacked with heavily discounted liquor, and a checkout form asking for full card details.
The discounts do much of the persuading. Seeing premium brands advertised at 60% or 70% off encourages people to buy first and ask questions later.
The same WordPress/WooCommerce template powers every site in the network. They share the same product catalogue, prices, and images. The only differences are fabricated US business addresses and phone numbers that are swapped out for each domain.
How to avoid this scam
Be sceptical of discounts that don’t match a retailer’s usual promotions, especially on liquor or electronics.
Check the address bar before entering payment details. A genuine Walmart sale won’t send you to an unfamiliar .shop domain.
Use tools that can identify scam websites automatically, such as Malwarebytes Browser Guard on desktop, or ask Scam Guard if it thinks a domain is suspicious.
On mobile, where these sites are designed to work, Malwarebytes Mobile Security can block known phishing and scam domains before you reach the checkout.
If you already entered your card details
Contact your card issuer immediately. Explain what happened and ask whether the card should be cancelled and replaced.
Watch your account for unauthorized charges, including small “test” transactions.
Report the domain through your browser’s phishing reporting feature and to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov if you’re in the US.
The simplest defence is also the most effective: if a retailer needs a lookalike domain to sell you something, it’s probably a scam.
With the World Cup on, you’ll find no shortage of websites promising every match, live, in HD, for free. They look convincing, usually with a video player, a “Live Stream Available” indicator, a row of server buttons, maybe a match schedule, and a “Watch Live” button. There’s no signup, no paywall, and seemingly, no catch.
But of course there’s a catch. These sites aren’t really in the business of streaming football. What the page is really built to do is fire pop-ups, hidden ads, and redirects through an advertising network we detect as malicious. Instead of watching the match, visitors end up facing scams, malware, and fraudulent downloads.
Here’s how the scam works and how to stay out of it.
If they’re not real streaming sites, what are they?
We’ve identified more than 40 websites that are effectively identical. They use different World Cup-themed names, but behind the scenes they’re running the same page template, the same code, and the same advertising infrastructure.
A script generates a separate page for every match, making the operation cheap to run and easy to scale.
When a stream appears at all, it’s usually embedded from a third-party piracy service. The real business is the advertising surrounding the player.
A typical page loads eight or more ad and tracking scripts from the same shady network, plus a handful of other ad domains. The hub the whole page is wired to is a domain we detect as malicious. Your data is the product; the “stream” is the bait.
Why these sites are dangerous, not just annoying
It’s tempting to shrug this off as the usual price of free streams. But it’s worse than facing a few annoying ads.
The real threat is the ad network. This isn’t mainstream, vetted advertising. The kind of ad network we flag as malicious is a common delivery route for the stuff that causes harm: fake virus warnings, bogus software update prompts that install malware, fake prize and verification pages, and forced redirects into subscription traps.
The video window itself is untrusted. The stream is pulled from a third-party piracy service, not anything the site controls or vets. Pirated stream embeds are a well-known source of their own ads, redirects, and hidden clickable overlays, so even the part that looks like a video player can be working against you.
There’s nobody behind the counter. These are anonymous, disposable sites built around a major sporting event. There’s no real company, no support, no accountability, and no reason for them to care what lands on your screen.
It’s the oldest play in the scam handbook: take something millions of people want right now, present it nicely, and monetize the rush. Scammers don’t create the demand, they just stand in front of it with a bucket and collect payment.
How it works (a quick technical version)
The first tap is hijacked. A script waits for your first click or tap anywhere on the page and uses it to open an ad in a new tab or window, often in the background. Before you’ve watched a second of football, you’ve already triggered an ad.
The “Play” button is a maze. Clicking Play doesn’t play anything. Instead, you’re sent through prompts like “Click Resume to continue” before you might reach a video. Every extra step is another click, and each click triggers more ads.
Invisible ads load. The page quietly loads tiny, invisible 1×1-pixel ads and opens more tabs. These exist purely to generate paid ad views. The tactic has many of the hallmarks of ad fraud, and you’re the unwitting traffic. More ads are injected into the player area the moment you try to watch.
The stream is an afterthought. Often there’s no working stream at all, so the page loops you through “Streams loading… Retry,” which means more clicks and more ads. Whether you ever see the match or not, the ads have already cashed in.
What the ads are serving up
The code fires the ads; but here’s what comes out the other end. On these pages, the injected ads tend to fall into two buckets, and neither has anything to do with football.
The first is fake message notifications: little pop-ups designed to look like real chat alerts, complete with a stranger’s photo and messages such as “Seen my message yet? Let’s talk!” Some include fake voice messages or explicit thumbnails. They’re made to look like notifications you’ve forgotten to check so you’ll click them.
The second is crypto bait. These ads promote “play-to-earn” games with promises of daily rewards, surprise drops, massive airdrops, and eye-catching claims like a “124% APY yield engine.”
One warning sign is the promise of guaranteed triple-digit returns and free money for tapping a button. That’s not how legitimate financial products work.
That’s the whole machine working end to end: football is the doorway, the malicious advertising network is the engine, and the scams are what it’s actually selling.
How to watch the World Cup safely
These “Free HD stream, every match, no catch” sites use football as bait to funnel visitors through a malicious advertising network. Here’s how to stay safe:
Use official broadcasters and streaming services. That’s where the legal and safe coverage lives.
Treat “every match, free, HD, no signup” as a red flag. Broadcast rights are expensive. If a random website is giving everything away for free, it’s making money some other way.
Don’t follow a maze of interactions. If a streaming site opens pop-ups, launches extra tabs, or sends you through endless “click to continue” screens, close it.
Never trust warnings or download prompts on these sites. Don’t download anything, install anything, or enter any information.
Block ads and trackers in the browser. A tool like Malwarebytes Browser Guard can block the advertising and tracking domains these sites rely on, helping stop pop-ups and redirects before they load.
Keep your software up to date. Browser and operating system updates often fix security vulnerabilities that attackers try to exploit.
Use up-to-date, real-time anti-malware. If you do click something malicious, products like Malwarebytes Premium can block and remove malware before it causes damage.
During our recent threat hunting activities, we found EtherRAT malware being distributed by a website with a strange homepage. This homepage allowed us to discover a vast malicious infrastructure distributing malware, malicious documents, remote desktop software, and phishing pages.
EtherRAT is a RAT developed in Node.js which allows an attacker to gain complete control over the machine and execute arbitrary code returned by the Command and Control (C2) server. The malware uses the Etherium blockchain to obtain the C2 server, hence the “Ether” part of the name. EtherRAT is typically distributed via MSI, PowerShell, or JavaScript scripts.
An open directory that distributes EtherRAT: where it all began
While threat hunting, we found an open directory that was distributing MSI installers and PowerShell scripts, which ultimately distributed EtherRAT. In the analyzed cases, the PowerShell scripts and MSI installers were distributed from a “/install” folder. The versions have a progressive number, ranging from v1 to v10.
Open Directory hosting EtherRAT MSI
The returned home page caught our attention and prompted us to further explore the campaign.
The homepage returned by the EtherRAT distribution website
Analyzing domains and associated IPs with the EtherRAT distribution, we detected other similar home pages with a hacking-style theme. They appeared to belong to a larger distribution chain, which also distributes phishing, remote control software, and other malware. These websites usually have several folders with malware and phishing related content, and what is displayed depends on the specific infection chain.
Different websites that resolve to the same IP addresses have previously returned pages related to fake companies or default templates. The use of these new pages could therefore be a method to make detection more difficult for automated scanners or researchers. Here are some of the home pages we found:
Some of the malicious websites indexed on Google
EtherRAT is an interesting RAT, as it has few lines of code and allows the execution of arbitrary code returned by the C2 server. Furthermore, using the Ethereum blockchain to obtain the C2 server makes it more resilient to infrastructure takedowns.
Technical analysis of EtherRAT
The detected websites usually distribute an MSI or PowerShell script with the version name, such as v1.msi, v2.ps1, and so on.
MSI Loader
The MSI file “v9.msi” contains three components:
MSI Filename
Description
KmPuGimn.cmd
BAT launcher
cDQMlQAru0.xml
First Jscript loader
MRaQCipBIZeiZNx.log
Encrypted EtherRAT
When the MSI is executed, the “KmPuGimn.cmd” file is started:
conhost --headless cmd /c "KmPuGimn.cmd"
This obfuscated BAT file performs different operations:
Extracts the other files in a random folder in %LOCALAPPDATA%.
The final stage is to deploy EtherRAT. EtherRAT allows the attacker to:
Execute arbitrary JavaScript code received by the C2 server. This allows the attacker to execute new commands, perform operations on files and folders, modify the registry, and exfiltrate data.
Get a new C2 server using the Ethereum blockchain.
Reobfuscate itself.
Save the logs to “svchost.log”.
Part of decrypted EtherRAT code
The EtherRAT uses Ethereum’s “eth_call” JSON-RPC method to retrieve the active C2 URL from a smart contract on the Ethereum mainnet.
After startup, the RAT sends its own source code to the C2 server. The C2 responds with a newly obfuscated version of the script, which is written back to disk, making each execution generate a new file hash.
POST /api/[REOBF_PATH]/<victim-uuid>
Body: { "code": "<current_script_contents>", "build": "<build_id>" }
After the EtherRAT execution, we observed different post-compromised cmd.exe activities to check the environment. For example:
The activities performed by the PowerShell loaders are very similar to the last stage of the JS script of the MSI installer:
Downloads Node.js if it’s not present.
Create the necessary directories.
Decode the EtherRAT with a custom decryption algorithm.
Execute Node.js with conhost.exe and the decrypted EtherRAT payload.
We detected some variants of the PowerShell loader hosted on these websites; namely that the functions’ names and the decryption functions change in the analyzed PowerShell scripts.
The decryption of EtherRAT payload with the custom decryption algorithm
Tracking the malicious infrastructure
When we analyzed the different websites with the “hacking-theme” pages, we found that in the past many had hosted multiple phishing pages in some specific paths. For example:
/zht/sharep-redirect.html
/bl/me.php
/t/teams
/teams/Windows/invite.php
It seems that these domains and IPs are actually part of a much larger infrastructure that distributes malware, phishing, malicious documents, and remote software. It is possible that these infrastructures are shared by multiple threat actors who activate different URL endpoints based on the specific campaign.
Interestingly, the majority of the domains related to this malicious infrastructure in the past also returned an HTML page related to a “Bulletproof Infrastructure” service.
We found that these phishing campaigns typically start via emails with documents attached, such as PDF or Excel files. These documents ask the user to click a link to view another document. Below are two examples of the phishing documents attached to the emails:
These phishing pages typically ask the user to enter their email address, then continue the infection chain and distribute phishing or malware pages. Below are some of the phishing pages detected within the malicious infrastructure:
Misconfigurations exposed the phishing kits
While tracking malicious websites, we found one with an open directory containing part of the phishing kit used in the campaigns.
Open directory hosting part of phishing kits
The open directory contained several folders with code and pages related to the phishing campaigns.
Phishing kit code
Additionally, some domains were misconfigured and allowed the download of “cl.zip”, which contained the source code for the “URL Cloaker” pages.
Online gamers should watch out for a convincing scam that aims to steal your Steam account.
The scam uses fake FACEIT verification pages that look legitimate, complete with official branding, working links, and what appears to be a real Steam login window. By the time it asks for your password, many victims are convinced they’re interacting with a genuine service.
The goal is to steal your Steam account.
Why this scam targets FACEIT players
If you’re not a competitive gamer, FACEIT might not mean anything to you. But to millions of people, it’s a big deal, and that makes it a target for impersonation by cybercriminals.
FACEIT is one of the largest competitive gaming platforms for Counter-Strike 2 (CS2). Millions of players use it for ranked matches, tournaments, leagues, and advanced anti-cheat protections.
To use FACEIT, players typically connect their Steam platform accounts, which are valuable for scammers.
A stolen Steam account can contain:
Hundreds or thousands of dollars’ worth of purchased games
Valuable CS2 skins and items, some worth significant amounts of real money
Wallet funds and saved payment methods
Years of friends, messages, and community reputation
Once criminals gain access, they can steal items, scam friends, or sell the account on criminal marketplaces.
Because FACEIT connects to Steam, a fake “FACEIT verification” page is an easy way to trick people. Victims think they’re updating their account, but attackers are really trying to steal Steam accounts that may contain valuable games, skins, and wallet funds. Gamers are especially vulnerable because they’re used to linking accounts and following verification steps, and may act quickly if they think their access to a game is at risk.
How the scam works
The attack starts with a website that looks like an official FACEIT page. The scam pages are likely distributed through the same channels gamers use every day: community forums, chat servers, social media posts, and direct messages.
The page claims FACEIT is offering free, optional identity verification to help build a more trusted community. It’s polished, uses the correct branding, and even includes working links to FACEIT’s real blog and support pages. Everything about it is designed to make you think you’re on a genuine FACEIT website, but you’re not.
Fake FACEIT verification page
Instead of using the official faceit.com domain, the scammers use lookalike addresses such as:
faceit-discord.com
faceit-clubs-verify.com
faceit-verification-clubs.com
The extra words like “verification” or “discord,” are designed to make these addresses look legitimate at a glance, but they’re sites that are controlled by cybercriminals.
Many of these domains are only days or even hours old. Scammers constantly register new ones, knowing they’ll likely be blocked eventually. That’s why a site not being flagged as dangerous doesn’t mean it’s safe.
There are small clues, though. In one example, the page listed both “Copyright 2024” and “Copyright 2025.” Legitimate companies rarely make mistakes like that, but scam sites often do.
After the verification pitch, the page claims there’s a problem with your CS2 account and asks you to update your information to prove you’re not a cheater or using a smurf account.
Here’s the clever part. The QR code appears blurry and difficult to scan. Researchers believe that’s intentional. After a few failed attempts, many users are likely to give up and click the easier-looking “Sign in through Steam” button instead.
The broken QR code is the nudge that guides victims toward the part of the page where the real theft happens.
Fake FACEIT page with a blurry QR code and “Sign in with Steam” button
When users eventually give up on the QR code and click the button, a Steam login window appears. It looks convincing, complete with the Steam logo, login fields, and what appears to be a steamcommunity.com address bar.
But the window is fake.
Fake Steam sign-in window steals your account details
Instead of opening a real Steam login page, the scammers display a convincing copy inside the website itself. Security researchers call this a Browser-in-the-Browser attack. The fake window looks and behaves like a genuine browser pop-up, but the address bar is just part of the image.
Anything entered into the form goes straight to the criminals. If the page also asks for a Steam Guard code, that gets stolen too, allowing attackers to access the account. Some victims are then tricked into “protecting” their items by transferring them to a friend or backup account, when they’re actually sending them directly to the scammers.
How to protect yourself against this scam
A few simple habits can stop this scam:
Check the real address bar. FACEIT’s official website is faceit.com. Be wary of lookalike domains such as faceit-discord.com or faceit-clubs-verify.com. Remember: a login window inside a webpage can fake its own address bar. Trust the one at the top of your browser, not the one inside the page.
Be suspicious of blurry QR codes. Researchers believe the QR code in this scam is deliberately blurred to push users toward the “Sign in through Steam” button instead.
Treat urgency as a warning sign. Messages about account problems, verification, or losing access are designed to make you act quickly. Slow down and verify first.
Go to the source. If you’re unsure whether FACEIT or Steam needs something from you, open the official website or app yourself rather than following links from Discord, messages, or ads.
Add another layer of protection. Scam sites often look legitimate. Malwarebytes Browser Guard can help block known phishing pages and other online scams before you enter your username and password.
If you already entered your details
Change your Steam password immediately, make sure Steam Guard is enabled, and sign out of all other devices. Check your Steam API key settings and remove any key you don’t recognize. Change the password anywhere else you reused it and review your account for unauthorized trades or purchases.
Why this scam works
This scam works because it doesn’t look like a scam. The branding is convincing, the story makes sense, and even the Steam login window appears legitimate.
Most people know to check the address bar before entering a password. Browser-in-the-Browser attacks are designed to defeat that habit. Because the fake Steam window is built into the page itself, the criminals can make its address bar say whatever they want, including steamcommunity.com.
The safest approach is to be suspicious of any login window that appears inside another website. If you’re unsure, close the page and sign in to Steam the way you normally would, through the official app or by typing the address yourself.
That small pause, that refusal to take the convenient shortcut a page is pushing you toward, is all it takes to keep your account yours.
Stop threats before they can do any harm.
Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocks phishing pages and malicious sites automatically. Free, one click to install. Add it to your browser →
A new Windows malware campaign hides inside pirated PC games and modified installers for franchises like Far Cry, Need for Speed, FIFA, and Assassin’s Creed.
The infection method is simple and effective. Users are lured into installing a fully functional free game. While the cracked and repacked game appears to work, the malware installs silently in the background.
The strain is being called “RenEngine loader” and sometimes referred to as Ren’Py because parts of the malicious code are embedded in a legitimate Ren’Py launcher used to run some visual novel games. When the launcher runs, it decompresses the game files and secretly starts the infection chain.
Ren’Py is a legitimate, open-source visual novel engine used by developers to make story-driven games with text, images, sound, and interactive choices. The malware in this case is not Ren’Py itself. Attackers are abusing the engine or its launcher as a delivery method to hide malicious code inside pirated game installs.
In practice, the primary infection vector is software piracy. Victims download cracked games or repacked installers from unofficial sites, then run what looks like a normal game launcher or setup file. In reality, they’re infecting their computer with a malware loader.
At the time of writing, this loader is trying to deliver an infostealer called ARC, which can grab saved browser passwords, cookies, cryptocurrency wallets, autofill data, system details, and clipboard contents.
But we’ve also seen other payloads being dropped, including Rhadamanthys stealer, Async Remote Access Trojan (RAT), and Backdoor.XWorm, which can expand the damage from credential theft to full remote control of the machine. That can mean account takeovers, financial fraud, crypto theft, and deeper compromise of personal or work data.
Worst of all, a user may not realize they are infected until usernames and passwords have been stolen or the machine starts behaving strangely.
How to stay safe
The most important lesson here is that “free” cracked software is often a delivery mechanism for malware, not a bargain. Once a loader like this is on the machine, the real goal is usually to steal credentials or install a secondary payload that is more persistent and more damaging.
Some other general advice to stay safe:
Don’t download installers from unofficial sources.
Keep your software up to date, especially Microsoft patches and other security-related programs.
If you think your computer is infected and want to make sure, follow the instructions posted here. The amazing volunteers on our forums will help you through the process of cleaning your machine.
We don’t just report on threats—we remove them
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.
A new batch of fake payment invoices is being staged right now, and we caught the campaign while it was still being put together. The emails impersonate PayPal, Amazon, and Geek Squad, and others, and they all share one goal: to scare you into calling a phone number where a fake “support agent” is waiting.
What makes this wave unusual is that some of the templates we recovered still contained blank fields where the phone number and price should have been, while others were already complete and in circulation. We caught the campaign mid-rollout.
What’s the scam?
If you receive an email that looks like a receipt—“Your subscription renewed for $349,” “You sent a payment of $598.96”—and it tells you to call a number to cancel or dispute the charge, stop.
There is no charge. The email exists to get you on the phone with a scammer who will then try to talk you into handing over remote access to your computer, your card details, or a “refund” that somehow requires you to send them money.
This particular flavor is called a “phantom invoice” or “refund” scam, and the trick is psychological, not technical. That’s why these emails can often slip past spam filters: there’s often no malicious attachment or link for security systems to analyze. The scam is in the phone number you’re urged to call.
If you didn’t make the purchase, there’s no need to call the number in the email to cancel it. Real companies don’t pressure customers into resolving unexpected charges through unsolicited phone numbers.
The goal is simple: create enough concern to get you to call. You see a significant charge you don’t recognize, say $499, and your first instinct is to stop it. The invoice helpfully provides a number to call “if this wasn’t you.” So you call, and now you’re talking to the scammer.
From there, the conversation usually leads to one of a few outcomes. They may ask you to install software so they can “fix” the charge, giving them access to your computer. They may ask for your card or bank details to “process the refund.” Or they may “accidentally” refund too much and ask you to send the difference back, usually by gift card or bank transfer.
The invoice is just the bait, while the phone call is the trap.
These emails are convincing, and some are already reaching inboxes. The good news is that simply receiving one doesn’t put you at risk. The scam only works if it succeeds in getting you to call the number provided. If you recognize the message as fraudulent and delete it, the attack stops there.
If you did call the number and followed instructions from a scammer, run a virus scan and check your bank accounts. Change your critical passwords, enable multi-factor authentication (MFA), and make sure your security software is up to date.
How we caught it half-built
Most scam investigations start after the damage is done. This one was different. We came across a cluster of nearly identical invoice templates that were clearly part of the same kit, and several of them were incomplete.
Where a finished scam email would show a phone number, some of these showed the literal text #TFN# instead, which is just a placeholder. (“TFN” is the scammers’ shorthand for toll-free number, the callback line they route victims to.) Others left the price as #PRICE#, the date as #DATE#, and the recipient as #EMAIL#. These are merge fields—the blanks a bulk-sending tool fills in automatically before a campaign goes out.
Finding those placeholders still in place told us that the operation was still being assembled. Some templates were still half-finished, while others were already complete and carrying live callback numbers. We’d caught the campaign mid-rollout, between being built and fully launched.
Why these invoices look believable
The scammers use familiar brands such as PayPal, Amazon, and Geek Squad. They’re companies people expect to receive receipts and renewal notices from, which lowers suspicion.
The charges are also carefully chosen. Amounts in the few-hundred-dollar range are large enough to cause concern but still seem plausible as a subscription renewal or online purchase.
Many messages add urgency, telling recipients to call quickly to dispute or cancel the charge. This pressure is designed to stop people from verifying the transaction independently.
Some invoices even combine trusted brands, such as claiming a payment was sent through PayPal to Amazon. Referencing multiple well-known companies makes the message appear more credible.
How to spot a fake invoice
The good news is that these scams share warning signs. Once you know what to look for, they get a lot easier to catch. Watch for any of these:
A charge you don’t remember making. If you don’t recognize the charge, verify it independently through your account or bank. If there’s no record of it, the invoice is likely a lure designed to get you to call.
A ticking clock. “Call within 12 hours,” “cancel before it renews,” or “act immediately” provide fake urgency designed to stop you thinking. Real billing problems can wait while you check.
Brands you trust, used as cover. The more familiar the logo, the less carefully people read. Scammers borrow trust they didn’t earn.
Odd details that don’t quite fit. A PayPal email “from” Amazon, a stray address that belongs to no one, or slightly off wording. Trust the small things that feel wrong.
Pressure to keep you on the phone. Once you call, a real company would never stop you from hanging up to verify, but a scammer will.
If even one of these is present, treat the whole message as suspicious.
Remember the single rule that defeats this entire scam: A genuine company will never rush you onto a call to undo a payment you never made. If you’re not sure whether a charge is real, close the email and check your account the normal way: by typing the company’s website into your browser yourself, or calling the number on the back of your bank card.
Pro tip: Malwarebytes Scam Guard can help spot scams like these and guide you in what to do next, while Browser Guard will block you from accessing scam websites.
What to do if one of these lands in your inbox
If you receive a suspicious invoice like the ones described here, take a few simple precautions:
Don’t call the number. That’s the core of the scam. Legitimate refunds or cancellations don’t require you to call a number from an unsolicited receipt.
Don’t reply or click anything. Treat the message as suspicious, even if it looks legitimate.
Verify charges independently. If you’re concerned a charge might be real, log in directly to PayPal, your bank, or the retailer by typing the address yourself and reviewing your transaction history.
Report it. Forward suspected phishing emails to the impersonated company’s abuse address and, in the US, report them to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov. Reporting helps disrupt scam operations.
If you already called, end the conversation. Don’t install any software they recommend. If you granted remote access or shared payment information, contact your bank immediately and run a trusted security scan on your device.
Be wary of urgency. Phrases like “within 12 hours” or “cancel now” are designed to pressure you into acting before you think. Take the time to verify the claim independently.
Scammers are increasingly shifting to tactics that software can’t easily inspect. A phone number in an email is difficult for security tools to evaluate, and the actual scam happens over a phone call instead of through a malicious link or attachment.
That’s why finding this campaign during rollout matters. Instead of seeing the damage afterward, we got a look at the preparation: unfinished templates, incomplete details, and the scam kit before it was fully deployed.
The best defense is simple: if an unexpected invoice tells you to call a number immediately, stop and verify the charge independently first.
Indicators of compromise
Domains
invoicepdfin[.]xyz
invoicepdfus[.]xyz
invoicepdfusa[.]xyz
invoicerep[.]xyz
invoicestatement[.]xyz
invoicestm[.]xyz
Callback numbers
804-392-2793
801-640-8589
Something feel off? Check it before you click.
Malwarebytes Scam Guard helps you analyze suspicious links, texts, and screenshots instantly.
Phishing has changed. Slowly but surely, cybercriminals are turning to infostealers instead.
Traditional phishing hasn’t gone away. Far from it. But many attackers are no longer focused solely on tricking victims into entering usernames and passwords on fake login pages. Instead, they are using infostealers to quietly collect passwords, cookies, browser data, and other sensitive information from infected devices.
This approach is attractive because it scales well and reduces friction. Instead of relying on a victim to type credentials into a fake site, the malware can harvest logins already saved in browsers, session tokens, autofill data, cryptocurrency wallet details, and even files that contain useful information.
This makes the attack chain less visible. A traditional phishing email often leaves obvious clues: a suspicious link, a fake login page, or a strange attachment. Infostealers are different. They can arrive through malicious online ads (malvertising), cracked software, fake browser updates, game cheats, or dubious download sites, and once installed, they work in the background, stealing whatever the victim’s device has in store.
Part of this shift could be due to the widespread adoption of multi-factor authentication (MFA). By stealing session cookies, cybercriminals can bypass MFA, so they can access accounts without needing a password or authentication code.
Another factor is the rise of the malware-as-a-service (MaaS) ecosystem. Infostealers are cheap to deploy, easy to scale, and highly profitable. Rather than building a full attack chain themselves, many criminals buy access to ready-made stealer kits, loaders, or initial access services from underground vendors. This lowers the barrier to entry and allows less-skilled attackers to run credential theft operations.
In many cases, infostealers are just the first stage of a larger criminal operation. The stolen data is collected, packaged, and sold to other criminals interested in the harvested information. These buyers may specialize in fraud, account takeover, business email compromise, or ransomware. A single infected machine can generate multiple revenue streams: credentials for one buyer, session cookies for another, and corporate access or wallet data for a third.
That division of labor is one reason infostealers have become so persistent. Operators can update their code, rotate infrastructure, and launch new campaigns with minimal effort, while affiliates handle distribution through phishing, malvertising, fake downloads, or social media lures.
How to stay safe
Because infostealers commonly arrive through malvertising, fake browser updates, and one-click downloads, it’s worth treating ads and pop-ups with healthy skepticism. My personal tip: Never click on sponsored ads. Instead, visit official websites directly and download software only from trusted sources such as official vendor sites or app stores.
Another increasingly popular technique is ClickFix, a social engineering attack that tricks users into infecting their own devices. Never run commands or scripts copied from websites, emails, or messages unless you trust the source and understand the action’s purpose. If a website tells you to execute a command or perform a technical action, check official documentation or contact support before proceeding.
Pirated software, game cheats, and cracked tools remain some of the most common delivery methods for infostealers. These downloads often come bundled with malware that installs alongside the software you intended to get. The same caution applies to many browser extensions and add-ons that promise extra features or convenience. Stick to extensions from reputable developers, check reviews and permissions carefully, and avoid installing any add-on that asks for more access than it plausibly needs.
Phishing emails are still a major threat, but many can be spotted if you slow down and verify before clicking. Even if an email looks like it comes from a trusted brand, treat unsolicited attachments and links with caution, especially when they urge you to open a file, install something urgently, or fix a billing issue. If you’re unsure, check the sender address, look for typos or odd phrasing, and confirm the request through a separate channel such as the company’s official website rather than the link in the email.
We don’t just report on threats—we remove them
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.
A new scam is targeting people who publish Chrome extensions.
The scam arrives as an official-looking “copyright removal request” claiming your extension is about to be removed from the Chrome Web Store and that you have 48 hours to appeal.
It even looks personalized. After you enter your extension’s ID to “verify” it, the page pulls in your extension’s real name and icon. But it’s all part of a phishing attack designed to steal your Google username and password.
If attackers gain access to a developer account, they may be able to take over the extension, access developer resources, or potentially push malicious updates to users.
What’s actually going on
If you’ve published a Chrome extension, you might encounter a page that looks like an official Google notice warning that your extension is being removed for copyright infringement.
The page asks you to enter your extension ID, then displays your real extension details alongside a complaint number and countdown clock. It pressures you to sign in with Google to file an appeal before time runs out.
None of it is real. The page is not operated by Google. The complaint, deadline, and countdown are fabricated. The goal is to trick you into entering your Google username and password into a fake sign-in window controlled by the scammer.
The most important rule to remember: Genuine warnings about your extension appear in your Chrome Web Store developer dashboard, not on a third-party website.
Why scammers want developer accounts
Chrome extensions have access to users’ browsers, and they can be updated automatically.
If attackers gain control of a developer account, they may be able to modify an extension, access developer resources, or potentially distribute malicious updates to existing users.
The page is hosted on a domain that has nothing to do with Google. In the version we analyzed, the site used the address dmca-chrome-extensions[.]click.
Despite that, it uses Google’s branding and presents itself as a “Chrome Web Store Developer Policy Center.”
The page first asks for the link or ID of your extension. That seems harmless, which is exactly why it works.
It uses your own extension to look convincing
After you enter your extension ID, the page briefly displays a “Looking up extension…” message and then builds a fake takedown notice around your real extension.
When we tested the scam with Malwarebytes Browser Guard, it displayed our genuine extension name, icon, and Chrome Web Store listing alongside the fake complaint.
The site is simply pulling publicly available information from your extension’s Chrome Web Store page. Anyone can see that information. The scammers use it to make the fake notice appear legitimate.
Everything else is invented.
The complaint number, “date received,” 48-hour deadline, countdown timer, and timeline of events are generated by the scam page itself.
The countdown is there to rush you
A red warning banner claims your extension will be permanently removed unless you act within 48 hours, and a clock counts down by the second. The whole layout pushes you toward one button: sign in with Google to “verify your identity” and file your appeal.
The urgency is designed to create pressure so you react before taking the time to verify the claim.
The fake sign-in window
When you click “Continue to verification,” a Google sign-in window appears with a title bar, padlock, and address showing accounts.google.com.
It looks authentic, but it isn’t.
The “window” is actually part of the web page itself. The padlock and address are just graphics designed to look like a real browser window.
The scammers even tailor the appearance to match your operating system, showing Mac-style windows on macOS and Windows-style windows on Windows devices.
Anything typed into this fake sign-in form is sent directly to the scammers.
One giveaway is that the window cannot leave the browser page. Try dragging it to the edge of your screen and it stops at the browser border. Minimize the browser and it disappears as well.
Most importantly, your browser’s real address bar still shows the scam site’s address, not Google’s.
How to stay safe
The good news is that a few simple habits defeat this scam.
Don’t trust the link. If you receive a warning about your extension, go directly to your Chrome Web Store developer dashboard and check there.
Be suspicious of urgency. Legitimate policy processes don’t rely on countdown clocks to force immediate action.
Check the address bar. A real Google sign-in page appears at accounts.google.com in your browser’s actual address bar.
Test the window. If a sign-in window can’t be dragged outside the browser or disappears when the browser is minimized, it’s probably fake.
Turn on stronger sign-in protection. Passkeys and hardware security keys make stolen passwords far less useful to attackers.
Use security software with phishing and web protection. Our Browser Guard, which is also part of Malwarebytes Premium can help block malicious websites and phishing pages before you enter sensitive information.
This isn’t a crude phishing page. It uses your real extension details, mimics Google’s branding, and creates a convincing sense of urgency.
If you receive a warning about your extension, don’t follow the link and don’t race the countdown. Go directly to your Chrome Web Store developer dashboard and verify the claim there.
When in doubt, close the tab.
If you already entered your details
Act quickly.
Change your Google password immediately from a trusted device.
Sign out of all active sessions in your Google account security settings.
Review connected apps and devices for anything unfamiliar.
Turn on two-step verification, preferably using a passkey or security key.
Check your Chrome Web Store listings for changes, uploads, or new versions you didn’t publish.
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)
Domain
dmca-chrome-extensions[.]click
Stop threats before they can do any harm.
Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocks phishing pages and malicious sites automatically. Free, one click to install. Add it to your browser →
A fake website impersonating BlueWallet (a real Bitcoin wallet) is targeting Mac users with a simple but effective attack. BlueWallet itself has not been compromised. Instead, cybercriminals have stolen the name and branding of the legitimate Bitcoin wallet to make a malicious download appear trustworthy.
If you went looking for a cryptocurrency wallet and landed on one of these fake BlueWallet download pages, the site tried to trick you into opening a downloaded file in a built-in macOS tool and pressing “Run.” If you followed those instructions, the malware could steal saved passwords, browser logins, cryptocurrency wallets, documents, and other sensitive data. It also watches the clipboard for cryptocurrency wallet addresses and can replace them with attacker-controlled addresses..
That last feature is particularly dangerous. If you copy a wallet address before sending funds, the malware can silently replace it with the attacker’s address. Everything looks normal on screen, but the money goes somewhere else.
Should you worry? Only if you downloaded and ran the file. Simply visiting the page and closing it does nothing on its own. The attack depends entirely on the user opening the script and pressing play.
If you did run it, treat the machine as compromised and follow the steps below.
What to do if you may have run it
If you opened the file and pressed play, assume your device was compromised and work through these steps:
Disconnect the machine from the network to cut the control channel
The most interesting part of this campaign isn’t technical. The attackers didn’t break into the Mac or bypass Apple’s security protections. They persuaded victims to run the malware themselves.
The fake website walks users through the process with a convincing download page, simple instructions, and even a keyboard shortcut. The attack succeeds because the victim trusts what they are seeing.
As operating systems get better at blocking malicious software, attackers are increasingly investing in social engineering. Instead of finding ways around security controls, they convince people to click through them.
That’s why one habit is becoming increasingly important: Be suspicious of any download that arrives with instructions to open it in a scripting tool, developer utility, or Terminal window and press “Run.”
In this campaign, a single press of ⌘R was enough to turn a Mac into a password stealer, cryptocurrency wallet thief, clipboard hijacker, and remote access tool.
Technical analysis
Stage one: The AppleScript downloader
The page lives at update-bluewallet[.]com, a domain name close enough to the real wallet (bluewallet.io) to pass a quick glance. The first thing the page does is not wait for consent. Its script calls a download routine on a two-second timer the moment the page loads, and again if the visitor clicks either of two buttons.
The file that lands in the Downloads folder is named BlueWallet Installer.applescript, an extension most people have never seen and have no instinct to distrust.
Then the page does something quietly clever. After a short delay, it rewrites its own status text to read like setup instructions: open the installer, then press the play button or ⌘R. It even draws a small blue play triangle in the text so the wording matches the real Script Editor interface the victim is about to see.
The page walks the victim through the exact motions needed to run the file.
On modern macOS, an unsigned application downloaded from the web gets quarantined and checked before it can run. A plain script opened in Script Editor and executed by the user sidesteps that flow. The person is manually instructing a trusted Apple tool to run code, so there is no notarization gate to fail.
This is why the attacker chose an AppleScript instead of a packaged app: it moves the risky action out of the operating system’s hands and into the victim’s.
The AppleScript itself is remarkably short. Stripped of its decorative comments, including a fake version number and a line claiming to be a “Brew Install Upgrade,” it runs a single base64-encoded shell command and then tells Script Editor to quit without saving, removing the evidence from view.
It fetches a second script from a remote host, saves it to a hidden file in the temp directory, makes it executable, and runs it in the background with all output suppressed.
The victim sees nothing. The filename .sysupd.sh is dressed up to look like a system update. This is a textbook staged dropper: stage one is tiny and disposable, and its only job is to fetch the real payload.
Stage two: Payload analysis
The first lines establish how the malware intends to operate. It sets umask 077 so everything it creates is readable only by the compromised user, then builds a hidden, randomly named working directory under /tmp seeded from /dev/urandom.
Its configuration is obfuscated, but weakly. A small function named _xd walks a hex string two characters at a time and XORs each byte against a hardcoded repeating key: swckR9JCD2Uu.
That function decodes the script’s Telegram bot token, chat identifier, secondary command token, and staging URL at runtime. It is enough to defeat tools that only search for plaintext strings, but not much more. Because the key and algorithm are both sitting in the file, every encoded value is fully recoverable.
One detail stands out: The decoded Telegram chat value and decoded command-and-control chat value are identical. The attacker is using a single Telegram channel as both the exfiltration drop and the control channel. It is cheap, scalable, encrypted, and blends into ordinary HTTPS traffic.
Not everything is obfuscated. The clipboard-hijacking addresses are sitting in the file in plain text: a Bitcoin address, an Ethereum address, and a Solana address. These are the addresses the implant swaps in when it catches you copying a wallet address. Because they are public on their respective blockchains, they are also among the most useful artifacts in the whole sample.
What the malware steals
The second stage’s collection routines are sweeping. They pull from six broad categories.
1. Web browsers
The script extracts history, cookies, login data, and bookmarks from a wide range of browsers, including:
Chromium-based browsers: Google Chrome Stable, Beta, Canary, and Dev; Brave; Microsoft Edge; Vivaldi; Opera; Opera GX; Arc; Chromium; Coccoc; and Yandex
Firefox-based browsers: Firefox, Waterfox, Pale Moon, Zen, and LibreWolf
macOS native browser data: Safari cookies, history, and form values
Other ecosystems: Yoroi, Lace, Petra, Martian, Suiet, Talisman, SubWallet, Braavos, and Temple
3. Password managers and security tools
The malware targets local storage and settings for several password managers, including LastPass, 1Password, Dashlane, Bitwarden, Keeper, RoboForm, NordPass, Enpass, StickyPassword, TrueKey, Passbolt, and Buttercup.
It also looks for data associated with 2FA and authenticator tools, including Google Authenticator, Authy, Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, 2FAS, and FreeOTP.
4. Communication and social apps
The script attempts to copy session data and local storage for Telegram Desktop and Discord, including Discord Canary and Discord PTB.
5. Developer and cloud tools
It looks for credentials and configuration files in the user’s home directory, including:
AWS CLI configurations in .aws
SSH keys in .ssh
GnuPG keys in .gnupg
Kubernetes configs in .kube
Shell and Git files including .zshrc, .zsh_history, .bash_history, and .gitconfig
6. Productivity apps and general files
The script copies the local Apple Notes database, NoteStore.sqlite.
It also looks for browser-extension data related to shopping and productivity tools, including Honey, CapitalOne Shopping, Rakuten, CamelCamelCamel, Grammarly, Evernote, Notion Clipper, Todoist, and Google Keep.
Finally, it scans Desktop, Documents, and Downloads for files with extensions including .txt, .pdf, .docx, .doc, .rtf, .wallet, .key, .keys, .seed, .kdbx, .pem, and .env, under a size cap.
What it does with the stolen data
The malware tries to capture the user’s account password directly. An osascript dialog titled “System Preferences” asks the user to re-enter their password “to continue.” The script validates each attempt against dscl . authonly before saving it, so it only stops once it has a working credential.
For exfiltration, it archives the staged data with macOS’s own ditto, likely because it is always present, unlike zip. To stay under Telegram’s 50 MB upload limit, it breaks larger archives into 49 MB chunks with split before sending each part.
It establishes persistence by writing a LaunchAgent plist into the user’s ~/Library/LaunchAgents, backed by a hidden support directory, and loading it with launchctl so the implant runs again at every login.
The clipboard hijack is a live background loop. A clip_watch function continuously inspects the clipboard, matches Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana address formats by regex, reports the original address to the command-and-control channel, and overwrites the clipboard with the attacker’s address via pbcopy.
That means the substitution happens silently between copy and paste.
Finally, the malware can be controlled interactively. A c2_loop polls the Telegram bot for commands and supports a full operator toolkit:
/info for system details
/exec for arbitrary shell commands
/clipboard to read current clipboard contents
/download to pull specific files
/exfil to rerun the theft module
/selfdestruct to wipe traces
This makes the Telegram channel a real-time remote-control link, not just a one-way drop.
Living off the land, and off Telegram
The pattern here is familiar and getting more common: lean on tools that are already trusted.
The delivery abuses Apple’s own Script Editor. The configuration hides behind a trivial XOR rather than packed binaries. The command channel rides Telegram’s Bot API, which can pass through egress filters that would flag an unknown server.
None of these pieces is novel on its own. The effectiveness comes from stacking legitimate-looking components so no single step trips an alarm.
Detection opportunities
The lessons here are less about the lure and more about the technique itself.
Script Editor executing a one-line base64 do shell script that immediately quits is a strong behavioral signal, and a far better detection target than the disposable stage-one file. So is a hidden /tmp/.sysupd.sh downloaded by curl and launched in the background.
Browsers and download surfaces could treat .applescript files arriving from the web with the same suspicion as executables. And Telegram remains an under-addressed command-and-control medium that bot-token abuse reporting could disrupt at the source.
A convincing fake website is impersonating OpenAI’s ChatGPT download page and infecting visitors with malware designed to steal passwords, browser data, cryptocurrency wallets, and other sensitive information.
The site, openew[.]app, closely mimics OpenAI’s real ChatGPT download experience and offers what appear to be official desktop apps for both Windows and macOS. Instead, Windows users receive a credential-stealing malware loader, while Mac users get Odyssey Stealer, a fork of Atomic Stealer (AMOS), a well-known macOS malware family associated with cryptocurrency theft.
The dual-platform setup is what makes the operation notable. Clicking the Windows download delivers a fake installer that opens a back channel to an attacker-controlled server. Clicking the macOS button delivers malware that steals browser passwords, cookies, Telegram sessions, cryptocurrency wallets, and other sensitive files. It also attempts to replace legitimate Ledger and Trezor wallet apps with trojanized versions.
If you only download ChatGPT from OpenAI’s official download page or the Microsoft Store, you were not the target here. But if you searched for “ChatGPT download” and clicked an ad or unfamiliar result, you may have given attackers access to your online accounts, browser sessions, saved passwords, and potentially your cryptocurrency holdings.
Malwarebytes protects users from this malware.
Technical analysis
The domain, openew[.]app, closely resembles OpenAI’s real ChatGPT download experience. It uses a dark theme, OpenAI-style branding, familiar marketing copy, and prominent download buttons for macOS and Windows.
The .app top-level domain is operated by Google and requires HTTPS connections, meaning browsers display the familiar padlock icon without obvious certificate warnings.
The most important detail is the dual-platform setup. Real software vendors provide separate installers for Windows and macOS, and this fake site does exactly the same thing.
Clicking the Windows button delivers Chat_GPT.exe, while clicking the macOS button downloads a disk image containing ChatGpt.dmg.
The Windows malware
Chat_GPT.exe is built almost entirely from off-the-shelf parts. The installer uses Inno Setup, a free open-source toolkit used by thousands of legitimate Windows products. Inside is an Electron application skeleton—the same Chromium-based framework used by apps like Slack and Discord—bundled with standard support libraries publicly available from the Electron project.
When the victim runs the installer, it creates files under %APPDATA%\LeronApplication, launches EApp.exe, and spawns PowerShell with the flags -ExecutionPolicy Unrestricted -Command -. The trailing dash tells PowerShell to read commands from standard input, meaning the malicious instructions never touch the disk where scanners might detect them. Behavioral telemetry recorded HTTP traffic to 188.137.246.189 using a /laravel.php?api=api&hash=...&message=... endpoint, alongside injection-like activity and service/autorun persistence signals. Nine of 69 antivirus engines flagged the file as malicious at the time of analysis. The persistence evidence is better read as behavioral tradecraft than proof of a durable install, but the overall pattern is familiar commodity stealer/dropper territory: cheap, modular, and effective rather than technically novel.
CAPTCHA displayed after the fake app launches, used to confirm that a real user is running it.
The macOS malware: Odyssey Stealer (an AMOS fork)
The macOS payload sits at the premium end of the commodity-malware market. It’s Odyssey, which is a fork of the renowned AMOS, a malware-as-a-service platform documented since 2023.
The identification is fairly clear-cut. The sandboxed sample matches documented Odyssey behavior patterns, which are inherited from its AMOS lineage: a long AppleScript chain passed to the macOS scripting engine, a silent password validation attempt using macOS directory-service commands, and, if that silent check fails, a fake macOS-style prompt reading “Please enter device password to continue,” complete with the familiar lock icon. Whatever the user types is validated against the same command. If it matches, the malware captures the user’s login password in cleartext.
From there, it follows a familiar Odyssey/AMOS-fork playbook. It copies the macOS keychain, harvests cookies and saved logins from 12 Chromium-based browsers plus Firefox and Waterfox, and extracts Telegram session data. It also scans 16 cryptocurrency wallet directories, including Ledger Live, Trezor Suite, Exodus, Electrum, and Sparrow. Finally, it searches Desktop and Documents folders for files with extensions like .wallet,.seed, .key, and .kdbx. The collected data is compressed into a temporary archive and sent to a hardcoded server.
The wallet replacement feature is especially dangerous
There’s one more part of the macOS payload, and it’s likely the feature that justifies the price tag. After the initial data theft, the script downloads trojanized versions of Ledger Live, Ledger Wallet, and Trezor Suite from a second server. It then attempts to delete the legitimate wallet apps and replace them with the attacker’s versions.
If the user’s password was captured earlier in the attack chain, the script uses sudo to force the replacement. If not, it falls back to a standard rm -rf deletion attempt, which can still succeed if the apps are installed in a user-writable location. Either way, the next time the victim opens what appears to be their wallet software, they may actually be launching the attacker’s replacement.
This wallet-replacement behavior is a hallmark of the Poseidon/Odyssey branch of the AMOS family and makes cryptocurrency theft the most likely goal.
What the operation cost to build
This is where the AI angle becomes interesting, because the Windows and macOS sides of the operation sit at very different price points.
The domain openew.app probably cost the operators around $15 a year through a normal registrar. The .app domain requires HTTPS by default, making it easy for operators to present the reassuring browser padlock users associate with legitimate websites. The landing page itself is simply a copy of OpenAI’s real download page, something modern cloning tools can reproduce in minutes.
On the Windows side, most of the tools are cheap or free. Inno Setup is free. Electron is free. The Chromium support files are public downloads. The server infrastructure appears to rely on low-cost commodity malware tooling and a basic VPS that could cost only a few dollars a month. Altogether, the Windows side of this operation could plausibly have cost under $100 to set up initially.
The macOS side is very different. Odyssey has reportedly rented for around $3,000 per month, paid in cryptocurrency. By comparison, Lumma—a popular Windows infostealer often treated as a similar product—has historically advertised entry tiers around $250 per month.
That price gap says a lot. The operators clearly believe a successful Mac infection is worth much more money than a typical Windows infection.
The likely reason is simple: Odyssey is designed specifically for cryptocurrency theft, including the wallet-replacement behavior seen in this campaign. The operators are betting that a meaningful number of Mac users hold cryptocurrency.
Getting victims to the site is probably the only major ongoing cost, and that’s where the AI branding becomes valuable. Search ads, SEO poisoning, YouTube spam, and links shared in AI-focused Discord and Telegram communities can all drive traffic to fake download pages. Some of those channels cost money. Others are almost free.
Why attackers are going after AI brands
Most established software already has trusted download habits built around it. If you want Chrome, you probably know to go to Google. If you want Photoshop, you go to Adobe. People already know where the real download lives.
AI tools are different because most users are still installing them for the first time, and that means relying on search results, ads, YouTube links, or social posts to find the download page. That creates an ideal environment for fake sites.
Over the last two years, products like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Sora, DeepSeek, Antigravity, and many others have launched or changed rapidly. Every new release creates another wave of users searching for “download ChatGPT” or “install Claude” without knowing the official URL. That search traffic is exactly where attackers set up shop.
The fake pages also do not need to be especially sophisticated because legitimate AI product pages are already minimal by design: a modern layout, a logo, and a large download button. Openew[.]app matches what users expect to see. There is no broken English or aggressive pop-ups here, just identical branding, copy, and the reassuring browser padlock.
What makes this kind of operation durable is how easily it can rotate brands. When the ChatGPT lure stops attracting clicks, the operators can reuse the same infrastructure around the next trending AI product. The malware behind the download button stays the same. Only the branding changes.
What AI vendors could do
Most major AI vendors, including OpenAI, already provide official download channels. The problem is visibility and user habit. Many users still search for “ChatGPT download,” where results can include official links, unofficial mirrors, and outright malicious sites.
Large consumer brands and banks often run aggressive brand-protection campaigns against fake ads and impersonation domains. AI vendors may need to do the same more consistently.
The other issue is discoverability. Official desktop-app links are often buried in settings menus or sidebars, while search engines are faster and more obvious. That’s exactly where the fake download sites are waiting.
What to do if you may have installed the fake app
If you recently installed something claiming to be ChatGPT from anywhere other than OpenAI’s official download page or the Microsoft Store, you may have been affected. From a different, clean device:
Sign out of your important accounts using each service’s “sign out everywhere” option. This includes email, banking, cloud storage, GitHub, Discord, Telegram, and cryptocurrency exchanges.
Change passwords starting with your primary email account.
Rotate any API keys, SSH keys, and cloud credentials stored on the affected machine.
If you hold cryptocurrency, move funds immediately using a separate clean device. On macOS specifically, do not open Ledger Live or Trezor Suite on the affected machine before reinstalling the operating system, as the wallet-replacement function may have succeeded.
Monitor bank accounts and payment cards for suspicious activity.
Reinstall the operating system. The Windows sample showed PowerShell command-and-control behavior, while the macOS payload may have captured the user’s login password. A clean reinstall is the safest recovery path.
If this was a work device, contact your IT or security team immediately.
Malwarebytes protects users against this malware.
Closing thoughts
The reason this campaign is worth writing about is not the malware itself. Both payloads are already well documented. The Windows side is a commodity kit assembled from cheap, widely available parts. The macOS side, Odyssey Stealer is related to the AMOS malware family that has been tracked since 2023.
What’s more interesting is the shape of the operation around that malware. A single fake site delivers two different payloads aimed at two different victim economics. Windows victims are positioned for broad monetization through credential and cookie theft. Mac victims are targeted more narrowly and lucratively through cryptocurrency theft, with operators apparently willing to spend thousands per month on tooling because the returns justify it.
The lure tying both sides together is the AI brand itself. Right now, AI product names generate huge amounts of first-time-download traffic from users who do not yet know the official URLs.
This is what a mature delivery business looks like. The interesting layer is not the binary, but the supply chain around it: the domain, certificate, clone page, traffic source, malware subscription, and exfiltration infrastructure. Each piece is cheap, modular, replaceable, and available off the shelf.
And the operators are not choosing between Windows and macOS. They are serving both from the same page, with payloads tuned to each platform’s economics. When one AI brand stops converting, they can simply swap the branding and reuse the same infrastructure around the next trending product.
AI hype will eventually fade. The kit probably will not.
Apparently, and this is an issue we’ve flagged before, social media platforms could stop scams, but they don’t because it hurts their revenue.
The Aldi meat box scam
This Facebook post immediately rattled my cage:
This promotion is not from Aldi and is not endorsed by the company. A random account, which may be compromised or completely fake, posts:
“My son works at Aldi and told me about something almost nobody knows. To be honest, I thought he was joking at first. If you’re over 40, you can get a meat box from Aldi for under $10. Sounds crazy, but it actually worked. They’re clearing out excess stock and, instead of throwing it away, they’re basically letting people have it for next to nothing. All I did was fill out a short form , I left the link in the comments in case it’s useful to anyone. I signed up for my husband (he’s 59 and loves a good steak), and when the box arrived, he opened it like it was his birthday. Everything looked fresh, neatly packed, and honestly there was more inside than we expected. It took me about a minute to fill out the form. If you’re over 40, definitely give it a go , worst case you lose a minute, best case you get a great box of meat almost for free.”
Unusual offer: Promises of high-value products (“meat box from Aldi for under $10”) for an extremely low price are classic signs of scams, especially when they leverage well-known brands.
Anecdotal story: The post uses a personal story (“My son works at Aldi…”) to appear trustworthy and relatable, a common technique in social engineering.
Age restriction: Arbitrarily targeting people over 40 is a psychological trick to make the offer feel exclusive and relevant.
External link: The most common tactic is to provide a link in the comments rather than in the main post to avoid automatic detection by the platform.
Urgency and simplicity: Encourages quick action with phrases like “took me about a minute,” downplaying any possible risk.
As it turns out, the possible risk, or “worst case” as the Facebook post calls it, is a lot worse than losing a minute of your time.
The first redirect sent me to a website where my device was fingerprinted using an embedded JavaScript before redirecting me to https://gifts-survey[.]life/click?key={identifier}, a site designed to mimic the Aldi website. I had my VPN set to the US.
The scam page immediately creates urgency with messages like “only 1 spot left” and “you only have 2 minutes to complete the survey,” trying to stop visitors from thinking things through.
The survey itself only asks basic questions, so there wasn’t much harm in clicking through it on my virtual machine.
As a reward, I got to pick three out of nine boxes to win a prize. I’m happy to report that I “aced” that test.
So, I was forwarded to the scammers’ real goal. On the domain hyperbargainsflow[.]shop, visitors are prompted to enter payment details for their discounted meat box, plus an optional upsell for faster delivery.
The final page asks victims to hand over personal details, including their full name, contact information, and home address, along with payment details for the fake “delivery” fee.
The site also uses tricks like more than 1,000 fake 5-star ratings and attempts to auto-complete and auto-submit the form if fields are detected as pre-populated. Saves you the trouble of submitting all your data yourself. Isn’t that nice of them?
If a post promises a box of premium meat for the price of a sandwich, assume it is a scam until you can prove otherwise.
The same simple checks will help you avoid this Aldi meat box scam and the next look‑alike campaign that pops up tomorrow.
Sometimes scrolling past the enthusiastic, fake comments will reveal what real users are saying:
You can also help slow these scams down by reporting them. On Facebook, click the three-dot menu on the post and choose Report post > Scam, fraud or false information.
If a deal claims to be “known only by insiders” or “almost nobody knows this,” treat it as a red flag, not a perk. Real retailers advertise widely and on their own accounts. They don’t hide genuine promotions in badly written Facebook posts from throwaway accounts.
Be wary of links posted in the comments. Scammers sometimes use that tactic to avoid automated scanning and reporting on the platform.
Check the browser address bar carefully. Scam pages can copy a brand’s logo and colors perfectly, but the domain name usually gives the game away.
Never enter card details, your full address, or your phone number into a site you reached via a random social post, especially if the offer feels too good to be true. If you already did, contact your bank or card issuer as soon as possible and monitor your statements.
Secure your devices. Use an up-to-date, real-time anti-malware solution with web protection. Malwarebytes blocks connections to unsafe sites like these.
Malwarebytes blocks gifts-survey[.]life
Pro tip: Malwarebytes Scam Guard recognized the Facebook post as a scam and could have saved somebody’s day.
Let’s face it, an incognito window can only do so much.
Breaches, dark web trading, credit fraud. Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection monitors for all of it, alerts you fast, and comes with identity theft insurance.
Some Malwarebytes users have recently noticed frequent web protection alerts while reading email in Yahoo Mail’s web interface. These alerts are caused by background connections from the Yahoo Mail page to a set of third‑party domains that our products and other security tools currently classify as risky.
What we are seeing under the hood
When you open Yahoo Mail in a browser, the page loads various embedded components for navigation, features, and metrics. As part of this, the interface makes calls to domains such as cook.howduhtable.com and related subdomains, sometimes in the context of URLs that include /ybar/mail.yahoo.com/ and a long encoded parameter. That encoded string often resolves to a URL like:
This suggests the traffic is being routed through what appears to be a sandboxed web component that Yahoo can use for things like telemetry, testing infrastructure, or mail features. It may also be part of an advertising or tracking flow, but at this time we cannot say with certainty exactly what purpose Yahoo is using it for.
Regardless of intent, multiple security systems have observed these redirect domains and assigned them poor reputations. Characteristics include:
Frequently changing, opaque subdomains that do not resemble normal consumer‑facing Yahoo addresses
Use of encoded parameters and chained redirects that make it difficult for users, and sometimes defenders, to see the final destination at a glance
Existing detections and blocklists from other vendors that classify the infrastructure as suspicious or potentially malicious
Because of these signals, Malwarebytes Web Protection and Browser Guard have been blocking a growing list of related subdomains to protect users, which is why some people see repeated alerts while using Yahoo Mail.
What we are not saying
It is important to be clear about what we do and do not know.
We have not established that Yahoo Mail itself is compromised or that Yahoo is deliberately distributing malware through its mail platform. What we can say is that third‑party or internal components invoked from within the Yahoo Mail web interface are making connections through domains that behave very similarly to infrastructure commonly associated with malicious or deceptive advertising and tracking.
From a security standpoint, this creates unnecessary risk. Any mechanism that injects content or runs sandboxed components via opaque redirect chains could, if misused or subverted in the future, expose users to harmful content without them ever clicking a suspicious link.
Blocking these domains is a precautionary step in line with our normal protection standards.
Why Malwarebytes blocks these redirects
Our decision to block these connections is based on a combination of technical behavior and third‑party reputation data:
The redirects are triggered by embedded components in the Yahoo Mail interface, not by users intentionally browsing to those domains
The infrastructure relies on frequently changing, non‑descriptive domains and subdomains, a pattern we often see in malicious or evasive advertising and tracking systems
Multiple security vendors and automated reputation feeds already flag these domains as risky or malicious, and some have seen them associated with unwanted or harmful activity
Because of this, Malwarebytes products currently block connections to these third‑party domains when they are invoked as part of Yahoo Mail’s web experience. This does not mean that all of Yahoo Mail is considered malicious. It means we are specifically interrupting a narrow set of background calls that present elevated risk.
What this means for users
If you use Yahoo Mail in a browser with Malwarebytes enabled, you may see:
Web protection or MWAC alerts referencing domains like cook.howduhtable.com or similar names while you are reading or composing email
Multiple alerts in a short period, because the mail interface may retry or rotate through different subdomains or IP addresses in the same family
In most cases, your email content itself still loads, though certain embedded elements, metrics, or ad‑related content may fail to load or behave differently.
How to stay safe and reduce interruptions
You should not need to lower your protection to continue using Yahoo Mail. Here are some practical steps you can take:
Keep Malwarebytes protection enabled Leaving Web Protection and Browser Guard on ensures blocks remain in place if these redirects change behavior or begin serving harmful content in the future.
Avoid allowlisting the suspicious domains While it’s technically possible to add exclusions for individual domains, doing so would allow their traffic to load unfiltered in your browser. We don’t recommend this unless you fully understand and accept the risk.
Use private/incognito windows for Yahoo Mail Accessing Yahoo Mail in a private/incognito session can help reduce persistence of certain tracking and advertising data because the browser discards cookies and local storage when you close the window.
Clear cookies and site data periodically If you see repeated alerts, clearing Yahoo‑related cookies and cached data may reduce some of the underlying tracking behavior that triggers these redirects.
Consider fewer‑ads options Yahoo offers paid plans that reduce or remove ads, and users can also use reputable content‑blocking extensions alongside Malwarebytes to cut down on ad‑driven behavior in webmail interfaces.
Our ongoing monitoring
The domains and infrastructure involved in these redirects are operated outside Malwarebytes, and their configuration or behavior may change over time. We are actively monitoring telemetry, sandbox reports, and reputation data for these domains and related infrastructure, and we will adjust our detections if new information emerges.
Our priority is to keep users safe while being transparent about why protection events occur, especially in widely used services such as webmail. If we learn more about the exact role of this component within Yahoo Mail, or if Yahoo provides additional clarity, we will update this article accordingly.
Stop threats before they can do any harm.
Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocks phishing pages and malicious sites automatically. Free, one click to install. Add it to your browser →
In our previous research, we analyzed a Windows infostealer we track as NWHStealer. The attackers behind this stealer are continuously finding new methods to distribute the stealer. During our hunting activities, we noticed how attackers are using a JavaScript runtime called Bun to help distribute it.
Bun is a legitimate, fast, all-in-one JavaScript and TypeScript toolkit designed as a modern, high-performance replacement for Node.js. It is built from the ground up to simplify modern web development by integrating several essential tools into a single executable.
Its relative newness also makes it appealing for attackers. Bun has not yet been widely seen in malware campaigns, and it allows them to package malicious code into larger executables that may be less easily detected.
What is NWHStealer and what can it do?
NWHStealer is a Rust-based stealer distributed using a range of lures and delivery methods. These include Node.js scripts, MSI installers, and, more recently, JavaScript loaders built with the Bun runtime.
It is often hosted on legitimate platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, MediaFire, Itch.io, and SourceForge, which helps it blend in with normal software and increases the chances of users downloading it. Attackers continue to create new profiles and lures to spread the stealer.
Once installed on your PC, NWHStealer can:
Collect system information, including operating system, hardware, security software, user data and connected devices.
Steal data from browsers, extensions and crypto wallets.
Steal data from different applications, including FTP applications such as FileZilla, CoreFTP and messaging apps such as Steam and Discord.
Inject malicious code into browser processes and run additional payloads (e.g. XMRig).
Attempt to bypass User Account Control (UAC).
Achieve persistence via scheduled tasks.
Get new command-and-control (C2) addresses from Telegram.
How to stay safe
Attackers are constantly adapting their techniques, and the use of newer tools like Bun shows how they try to stay ahead of detection.
NWHStealer is particularly concerning because of how widely it is distributed, and the types of data it targets. Stolen browser data, saved passwords, and cryptocurrency wallet information can quickly lead to account takeovers, financial loss, and further compromise.
Here are a few simple ways to stay safe:
Only download software from official websites.
Be cautious with downloads from platforms like GitHub, SourceForge, or file-sharing platforms unless you trust the source.
Attackers are continuing to create new profiles to distribute this stealer across platforms. Check the profile/developer/publisher’s profile, reputation, and how new it is when downloading something from file hosting providers or blogs.
Check the structure of the archives, that the content, images, txt files are consistent with what you downloaded. Also check the archive name, they usually have recognizable patterns.
Check the file’s publisher and signature before you run it.
The new distribution method: Bun JavaScript Runtime
According to its official site, Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript, TypeScript & JSX toolkit. It’s built from scratch in Zig and powered by Apple’s JavaScriptCore engine, with a focus on fast startup and low memory usage.
Bun is composed of four main components:
JavaScript Runtime: a JavaScript runtime designed as a drop-in replacement for Node.js.
Package Manager: a fast alternative for npm.
Test Runner: a built-in, Jest-compatible runner that executes tests much faster than standard runners.
Bundler: replaces tools like Webpack, Vite, or esbuild for packaging code.
In recent campaigns, we detected that NWHStealer is being distributed using a Bun JavaScript Runtime bundle.
As we saw in our previous research, game-related and other software lures are used to start the infection chain. Some of the detected ZIP names in these recent campaigns include:
Game-related software and cheats such as:
MOUSE_PI_Trainer_v1.0.zip
FiveM Mod.zip
VampireCrawlers_Trainer_v1.0.zip
MagicalPrincess_Trainer_v1.0.zip
TerraTechLegion_Trainer_v1.0.zip
Other software such as:
TradingView-Activation-Script-0.9.zip
AutoTune 2026.zip
Metatune by Slate Digital 2026.zip
GoGoTv_Plus.zip, Autodesk.zip
In the case analyzed in this article, the infection chain starts with an archive containing Installer.exe, which embeds JavaScript code bundled with the Bun runtime.
The “DW” folder contains another loader, called dw.exe. This self-injection loader is similar to the one analyzed previously, but with a different decryption routine. This loader is not present in all ZIP files analyzed.
The malicious ZIP contains two loaders
The Readme.txt file asks the user to manually launch dw.exe if the main .exe file fails to run properly. This gives the attacker two ways to distribute the stealer if the C2 of the main Bun loader is offline. The loader in dw.exe works independently from the Bun JavaScript loader.
The Readme file inside the ZIP archiveThe fake Build Tools setup shown if dw.exe is started
In this article, we don’t analyze dw.exe, as it’s a variant of the previous loaders. Instead, we focus on the JavaScript loader executed with the Bun JavaScript runtime.
Analysis of the JavaScript Loader
The executed JavaScript code by the Bun JavaScript runtime is inside the .bun section and is obfuscated.
The .bun section with the obfuscated JavaScript code
The malicious code is implemented in two parts of the code:
sysreq.js: performs the anti-virtualization checks with a score system.
memload.js: communicates with the C2 server, performs decryption and loads the next stage.
Entry point of the JavaScript loader
The loader runs several PowerShell CIM (Common Information Model) commands and WMI (Windows Management Instrumentation) commands to detect virtual environments. There are different controls related to CPU numbers, disk space, screen resolution, USB devices, hardware manufacturers and products, number of installed software, presence of specific folders such as Browser folders, number of running processes and username. A scoring system is implemented, and based on this score, the loader decides whether to continue with the infection or terminate it.
To detect a virtual environment, the loader executes more than 10 PowerShell commands, such as:
Get-CimInstance -ClassName Win32_DiskDrive | Select-Object Model
The strings are decrypted using XOR and base64 decoding; there are arrays of tuples and each contains the encrypted strings and a key used for XOR decryption.
Encrypted data with XOR keys
Several functions handle string decryption, including one that decrypts the config used in the C2 communication. Partial config:
The FIFA World Cup 2026 is scheduled to begin June 11 across the US, Canada, and Mexico. The web is filling with sites impersonating ticket vendors, telecoms, sticker publishers, toy manufacturers, immigration services, and crypto projects, all linked to the World Cup brand. Together, they map out four recurring patterns of fraud and risk targeting fans.
What World Cup fans need to know
If you’re planning anything around the 2026 World Cup, whether it’s buying a ticket or merchandise, booking a flight, applying for a US visa, or speculating on “World Cup” crypto, expect a surge in scams and other risky World Cup-related activity.
The good news is the patterns are obvious once you know what to look for:
Countdown timers that reset when you reload the page
Prices 80–90% below retail
The word “official” used without a clear link to the brand behind it
Crypto tokens claiming to be “official” World Cup products
Your headline rule for the next two months: If a site uses the World Cup or a known brand to get your money, stop and verify it from the official source before you do anything else.
How these World Cup scams work
The path to these scam sites is almost always the same: a fan searches for something on search engines or social media (for example, “World Cup 2026 jersey,” “buy Panini sticker album,” “visa to attend the World Cup,” “FIFA World Cup token”) and lands one of the hundreds of sites set up to exploit that demand.
Often the route there runs through an ad network. That might involve a sponsored search result, a banner on an unrelated site, or a redirect chain that sends the victim to a different domain than the one they clicked. (Note that tools like Malwarebytes Browser Guard can block malicious ads, scam domains, and redirect chains before the page loads.)
The branding on the destination site is consistent with the legitimate company. There are testimonials and satisfied-customer counts, so nothing looks immediately wrong. Urgency tricks like “Only a few items left” and the countdown timer are there to prevent you from looking too closely or investigating too deeply.
We’ve found these sites group naturally into four categories: crypto, travel, merchandise, and predictors. The sites in each category have their own tells, but they’re united by brand parasitism: borrowing authority from FIFA, the host nations, or a real licensee like LEGO or Panini.
Crypto
The most crowded category is crypto, and the biggest risk comes from sites that claim or imply official links to the World Cup.
One site marketed its token as “the official community token celebrating the FIFA World Cup 2026,” advertising a “Mega Airdrop,” a 7-billion-token total supply, and a participant counter pinned to the symbolic number 48 (the count of qualified national teams). Another shows FIFA’s official mascot, using tournament branding to sell an unlicensed token.
None of the sites we examined are connected to FIFA. FIFA does have a real digital-collectibles ecosystem—the FIFA Collect NFT marketplace, the Right-to-Buy ticket NFTs, and the FIFA Rivals game on the Mythos chain—all of which sit on FIFA-controlled infrastructure and are documented at FIFA’s own domains. None of the sites we examined sit inside that ecosystem. The real partners for 2026 are documented and easy to verify. “World Cup token” is not one of them.
We found multiple sites using FIFA branding to create a false sense of legitimacy. But there’s a real risk you’ll receive nothing, receive something you can’t sell, or sign a transaction that gives the operator access to your wallet.
Some sites don’t pretend to be official, but still carry risk to World Cup fans. One Solana-based token branded itself the “World Cup Rug Index,” with the tagline “Every match is a market. Every loss is a rug,” and a contract ending in “pump,” the signature of pump.fun launches.
In crypto, a “rug” is when early holders sell and the price collapses, leaving later buyers with losses. These projects are not scams in the sense of pretending to be something they’re not. They are openly speculative. The risk is in the structure: early buyers can sell into demand from later buyers, who are left holding the losses.
This is different from the fake “World Cup tokens” above. Those rely on FIFA branding to create a false sense of legitimacy. These rely on momentum, where most participants arrive late.
There is no official World Cup token
There is no official World Cup token
There is no official World Cup token
There is no official World Cup token
Travel
The most dangerous category is the “World Cup visa.” One site, WC2026 Visa, advertised a “Visa to the World Cup 2026 US” for $270 per person, with a “98% Success Rate,” a countdown to June 11, and the standard reassuring trio: “Secure Process,” “Fast Processing,” “18+ only.”
There is no such product. The US Department of State has stated this directly: there is no special tournament visa. Foreign visitors traveling to the United States for the World Cup must use the same B1/B2 visitor visa, or the Visa Waiver Program with an ESTA authorisation, that any other tourist would. The only tournament-specific visa programme is FIFA PASS (the Priority Appointment Scheduling System), a routing mechanism that gives ticket holders earlier interview slots at US consulates. It doesn’t bypass the interview, it doesn’t issue a visa, it doesn’t cost $270, and access to it begins with buying a ticket directly from FIFA.
A site advertising a dedicated “World Cup visa” tricks people into believing they’re going down an official immigration pathway. Any personal data harvested in the process, such as passport details, date of birth, travel plans, and in some flows a payment instrument, gives the operator all the data they need for identity theft. Fans should only apply through .gov sites in the US, .gc.ca in Canada, and .gob.mx in Mexico.
Travel portals aggregating tickets, flights, and hotels, and eSIM sites selling connectivity for the tournament are not inherently fraudulent and are often real businesses. But any site invoking the World Cup deserves the same scrutiny: who actually fulfils this product, what is the refund policy in writing, and is this domain legitimately connected to a known brand or partner?
Scam site selling World Cup tickets
Scam site offering Visas
Scam site selling World Cup tickets
Scam site selling eSIMs
Merchandise
The merchandise category is where the impersonation gets most aggressive, because there are real licensees to imitate. LEGO’s partnership with FIFA is genuine, announced in late 2025. It debuted with the LEGO Editions FIFA World Cup Official Trophy, joined in 2026 by player sets featuring Messi, Ronaldo, Mbappé, and Vinicius Jr. A whole cluster of LEGO-styled scam storefronts now prices the trophy set at €29.99, marked down from €299.99, an 83–90% discount. LEGO does not discount its premium licensed sets by 90%.
Related to those storefronts is the “LEGO FIFA World Cup 2026 Quiz Challenge” pattern, promising “exclusive edition rewards” for fans who complete a quiz. Quiz-funnel scams are a long-running affiliate-marketing genre, and the typical mechanic is to harvest contact information and push the user toward a subscription billing flow disguised as a shipping fee for the “prize.” LEGO does not run quiz funnels. Its real World Cup activity runs through LEGO.com and physical LEGO stores.
Counterfeit jersey storefronts have been a fixture of the open web for years, and the World Cup cycle multiplies them. Typical examples: a site branded simply “JERSEY 2026 World Cup” selling a Portugal home shirt with a “BUY 2, PAY FOR 1” overlay, a 30-day countdown, and a Trustpilot-shaped widget claiming over ten thousand satisfied customers; or a retro-jersey storefront offering Germany and Argentina shirts at $24.90 each. Search demand spikes during a World Cup year and counterfeit storefronts spin up to meet it; many will be offline shortly after the tournament ends.
Then there is the Panini-styled storefront pattern: pages advertising the official 2026 sticker album under headers like “ONE-TIME PURCHASE BY NIF” (NIF being the Portuguese personal tax identifier, a phrase that appears nowhere in legitimate Panini commerce). These pages combine sub-ten-minute countdowns, inventory counters (“There are still 127 Units”), and country-specific scarcity claims (“Only 5,000 units available for Portugal!”).
The high-pressure funnel and unusual NIF framing point to localised affiliate or look-alike storefronts, not Panini’s own commerce flow, which runs through paninistore.com and licensed retail. These are not Panini storefronts. They are look-alike commerce flows using Panini’s brand to sell through high-pressure funnels. Whether the product arrives or not, the user is not buying from the company they think they are.
Fake World Cup jersey site
Fake Panini site
Fake World Cup Lego site
Fake World Cup jersey site
Fake World Cup jersey site
Fake World Cup Lego site
Fake World Cup Lego site
Fake World Cup Lego site
Predictions and prize pools
“WorldCup Predictor” sites present a prize pool that supposedly grows with every prediction, and ask users to select a champion team from flag tiles. You are paying for entries into a pooled outcome tied to the tournament.
These sites are not pretending to be something they’re not. The risk is that they operate without clear oversight. There is no visible licensing, no clear jurisdiction, and no way to verify from the front end whether payouts are enforced or even guaranteed.
Licensed sportsbooks and regulated platforms typically do not present themselves this way. They identify their licensing authority, provide responsible gambling tools, and use verified payment processors. A “Login to play” button, a flag picker, and a floating prize pool are not the same thing.
“World Cup Predictor” sites are paid-entry pools, closer to unlicensed betting
“World Cup Predictor” sites are paid-entry pools, closer to unlicensed betting
What FIFA, the brands, and the platforms could be doing better
Many of these sites would not exist, or would be far shorter-lived, if a few things changed upstream. Brand owners with active 2026 partnerships—LEGO, Panini, the national federations, the kit manufacturers—could reduce confusion by publishing a single canonical page each, well before kickoff, listing authorized retailers and the exact SKUs and prices of their World Cup products. Someone trying to verify whether a €29.99 LEGO trophy is real should not have to triangulate between Brickset, LEGO’s newsroom, and a third-party blog.
FIFA’s own licensing communications have improved compared with past tournaments, and the LEGO and Panini announcements were clearly disclosed on inside.fifa.com. But the gap between “FIFA has announced a partnership” and “here are the only sites authorized to sell on FIFA’s behalf” remains wide. Closing it would make impersonation much harder.
Search engines and ad networks carry a large share of the structural responsibility. Visa-impersonation pages are precisely the kind of sites that surface through paid search ads against terms like “world cup visa,” and platforms have the data to detect and block them at scale.
What to do if you may have been caught
Every World Cup cycle generates its own scam economy. 2018 had fake ticket marketplaces; 2022 leaned on phishing around Qatar’s Hayya system; 2026 is building around meme coins and visa impersonation. What’s different this time is the speed: sites can be spun up, monetized, and abandoned within weeks, and AI-generated copy, mascot art, and product images have stripped away many of the visual cues people used to rely on.
This cycle’s scam economy moves fast, but the basics still work: treat unsolicited “World Cup” links with suspicion, type official domains yourself, and ignore pressure from countdown timers.
If you think you’ve been caught:
If you entered card details: Contact your card issuer immediately and request a refund for an unauthorized or non-delivered transaction.
If you submitted personal or passport data: Treat it as compromised. Monitor your credit, place a fraud alert if available, and watch for targeted phishing.
If you connected your crypto wallet or signed a transaction: Revoke permissions, move remaining assets to a new wallet, and stop using the old one for anything valuable.
If you bought goods that weren’t delivered: Keep your order confirmation, URL, and payment record. Report it to your national consumer protection body (FTC in the US, Action Fraud in the UK, or your local equivalent).
Always verify through official channels. That’s FIFA.com for tickets, paniniamerica.net or paninistore.com for stickers, LEGO.com for LEGO Editions sets, and official government sites for visas. Remember, legitimate sources do not rely on countdown timers.
Stop threats before they can do any harm.
Malwarebytes Browser Guard blocks phishing pages and malicious sites automatically. Free, one click to install. Add it to your browser →
During our threat hunting, we found a campaign using the same malware loader from our previous research to deliver a different threat: Needle Stealer, data-stealing malware designed to quietly harvest sensitive information from infected devices, including browser data, login sessions, and cryptocurrency wallets.
In this case, attackers used a website promoting a tool called TradingClaw (tradingclaw[.]pro), which claims to be an AI-powered assistant for TradingView.
TradingView is a legitimate platform used by traders to analyze financial markets, but this fake TradingClaw site is not part of TradingView, nor is it related to the legitimate startup tradingclaw.chat. Instead, it’s being used here as a lure to trick people into downloading malware.
What is Needle Stealer?
Needle is a modular infostealer written in Golang. In simple terms, that means it’s built in pieces, so attackers can turn features on or off depending on what they want to steal.
According to its control panel, Needle includes:
Needle Core: The main component, with features like form grabbing (capturing data you enter into websites) and clipboard hijacking
Desktop wallet spoofer: Targets cryptocurrency wallet apps like Ledger, Trezor, and Exodus
Browser wallet spoofer: Targets browser-based wallets like MetaMask and Coinbase, including attempts to extract seed phrases
The panel also shows a “coming soon” feature to generate fake Google or Cloudflare-style pages, suggesting the attackers plan to expand into more advanced phishing techniques.
Needle Stealer panel
In this article, we analyze the distribution of the stealer through a fake website related to an AI service called TradingClaw. We have detected that the same stealer is also distributed by other malware such as Amadey and GCleaner.
Analysis of the TradingClaw campaign
In this campaign, the malware is distributed through a fake website advertising TradingClaw as an AI trading tool.
Malicious TradingClaw website
The site itself behaves selectively. In some cases, visitors are shown the fake TradingClaw page, while in others they are redirected to a different site (studypages[.]com). This kind of filtering is commonly used by attackers to avoid detection and only show the malicious content to intended targets. Search engines, for example, see the Studypages version:
Google results shows the Studypages fake page
If a user proceeds, they are prompted to download a ZIP file. This file contains the first stage of the infection chain.
Like in the previous campaign, the attack relies on a technique called DLL hijacking. In simple terms, this means the malware disguises itself as a legitimate file that a trusted program will load automatically. When the program runs, it unknowingly executes the malicious code instead.
In this case, the DLL loader (named iviewers.dll) is executed first. It then loads a second-stage DLL, which ultimately injects the Needle Stealer into a legitimate Windows process (RegAsm.exe) using a technique known as process hollowing.
Needle Stealer injected in RegAsm.exe process
The stealer is developed in Golang, and most of the functions are implemented in the “ext” package.
Part of the “exe” package
What the malware does
Once installed, the Needle core module can:
Take screenshots of the infected system
Steal browser data, including history, cookies, and saved information
Extract data from apps like Telegram and FTP clients
Collect files such as .txt documents and wallet data
Steal cryptocurrency wallet information
One of the more concerning features is its ability to install malicious browser extensions.
Malicious browser extensions
The stealer also supports the distribution of malicious browser extensions, giving attackers a powerful way to take control of the victim’s browser.
We identified multiple variations of these extensions, each with slightly different file structures and components. Behind the scenes, the malware uses built-in Golang features to unpack a hidden ZIP archive (often named base.zip or meta.zip) that contains the extension files, along with a configuration file (cfg.json).
This configuration file is key. It tells the malware where to send stolen data (the command-and-control server), which malicious extension to install, and which features to enable.
The stealer extension is dropped in a random folder in the path %LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\Extensions. The folder contains three main files popup.js, content.js, and background.js.
The malicious extension dropped
The extensions analyzed have Google-related names.
The fake malicious extension on Edge Browser
What the malicious extensions can do
The extension gives attackers near full control over the browser, with capabilities that go far beyond typical malware.
It can:
Connect to a remote server using a built-in API key and regularly check in for instructions. It can also switch to backup domains if the main server goes offline.
Generate a unique ID to track the infected user over time.
Collect full browsing history and send it to a remote server (/upload).
Monitor what you’re doing in real time, including which sites you visit, and apply attacker-controlled redirect rules. This allows it to silently send you to different websites or alter what you see on a page, including injecting or hiding content.
Intercept downloads, cancel legitimate files, and replace them with malicious ones from attacker-controlled servers.
Inject scripts directly into web pages, enabling further data theft or manipulation.
Display fake browser notifications with attacker-controlled text and images.
How it communicates with attackers
The stealer and its extension communicate with command-and-control (C2) servers using several API endpoints. These are essentially different “channels” used for specific tasks:
/backup-domains/active—retrieves backup servers to stay connected if the main one is blocked
/upload—sends stolen data back to the attackers
/extension—receives instructions for redirects, downloads, and notifications
/scripts—downloads malicious code to inject into web pages
How to stay safe
Scammers are increasingly using AI-themed tools to make fake websites look legitimate. In this case, a supposed “AI trading assistant” was used to trick people into installing malware.
To reduce your risk:
Download software only from official websites. If a tool claims to work with a well-known platform, check the platform’s official site to confirm it’s real.
Check who created the file before running it. Look at the publisher name and avoid anything that looks unfamiliar or inconsistent.
Review your browser extensions regularly. Remove anything you don’t recognize, especially extensions you didn’t knowingly install.
What to do if you think you’ve been affected
If you think you may have downloaded this infostealer:
Check EDR and firewall logs for communications with the C2s listed in the IOCs part.
From a different, clean device, sign out of every active session on your important accounts: Google, Microsoft 365, any banking portal, GitHub, Discord, Telegram, Steam, and your crypto exchange. Change all passwords and enable 2FA for accounts you have accessed from this machine.
Check the folder %LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\Extensions and suspicious browser extensions.
If you have cryptocurrency wallets on the machine, move the funds from a clean device immediately. This is what these operators monetize first.
Somebody went looking for Google’s new Antigravity coding tool this week, clicked download, ran the installer, and got exactly what they thought they were getting. Antigravity installed cleanly. A shortcut appeared on the desktop. The application opened and worked. Nothing looked or felt wrong.
But behind the scenes, that installer can give your accounts, your data, and even your machine to an attacker, without breaking anything the user can see.
In this article, we’ll break down the technical details of the campaign, how it works under the hood, and what to do if you think you’ve installed it.
The download that actually gave you what you wanted
Google Antigravity launched in November 2025 and has been one of the most searched-for developer tools on the web ever since. The real product lives at antigravity.google. Hardly anyone new to the product has the real URL memorized, so when a user reached a hyphenated lookalike (what we call a typosquat domain) at google-antigravity[.]com it was convincing enough at a glance.
So they went on to download the file, called Antigravity_v1.22.2.0.exe.
The installer isn’t simply named to look like the real one from Google. It’s 138 MB: large enough to carry the entire Antigravity application, its Electron runtime, its Vulkan graphics libraries, its updater, all of it. Because that is what is actually inside.
The attacker didn’t build a convincing fake; they took the genuine Antigravity installer, added one additional step to run their PowerShell script during setup, and repackaged the result. The malicious step is one extra line in a sequence that runs dozens of legitimate ones. Here’s what the Setup looked like:
How do we know it’s one line? Because you can see it.
The MSI’s custom-action table (the list of every step the installer takes during install) contains 11 rows that are standard, boilerplate entries the installer tool generates automatically: extract files, check the Windows version, elevate to admin, write a log, clean up afterwards. Each of those has a name that starts with AI_ followed by a description of what it does. And then, sitting at the bottom of the same list, there is one more row, named wefasgsdfg — a keyboard mash the attacker typed in when the installer tool prompted them for a name, and the one that runs their PowerShell script.
Antigravity installs properly into C:\Program Files (x86)\Google LLC\Antigravity\. A Start Menu entry appears, a desktop shortcut is placed, and everything works. The user opens the app, tries it, closes it, and goes on with their day. It all seems fine, because they actually installed the thing they wanted to install. The malicious part is happening quietly, in a folder they’ll never open.
Two small scripts, and a phone call
Somewhere in the middle of the install, the MSI runs a small helper script that drops two PowerShell files into the user’s temporary folder: scr5020.ps1 and pss5032.ps1. The filenames look like specifics but aren’t: the four characters after each prefix are generated fresh every time the installer runs.
What stays constant is the prefix: scr for the user script, pss for the PowerShell wrapper, because those come from the installer tool’s standard naming pattern for custom-action scripts.
Of the two files, the second is an unaltered Advanced Installer utility. It’s genuinely innocent and present in many real products. The first was added by the attacker, and it has one job: open an HTTPS connection to https://opus-dsn[.]com/login/, download whatever code the server sends back, and run it. To blend in, it spoofs a Microsoft referrer header and routes through the system’s default web proxy, so it inherits whatever corporate proxy configuration and authentication IT has set up, without the user noticing. It also saves and restores the parent PowerShell’s TLS setting, leaving that one global unchanged after it exits. That’s the entire script.
Researchers call this pattern a downloader cradle, and its advantage to the attacker is flexibility. The real payload lives on their server, not inside the installer out in the wild, so they can swap it out, change targeting, or turn the operation off without touching the file users are downloading.
In this case, the cradle did exactly what it was built to do and no more: a DNS query for opus-dsn[.]com, a single TCP connection on port 443 to 89[.]124[.]96[.]27 with a quiet HTTPS GET to /login/, and then the PowerShell process exited.
Nothing else happened. No second-stage script was fetched. No file was dropped. No scheduled task was created. No changes were made to Windows Defender. Most automated security tools would shrug and move on.
But the malware hadn’t failed. It had introduced itself to the attacker’s server and asked for code to run next—and whether the answer comes back is a decision the operator gets to make later, on their own time, one victim at a time. You cannot tell, from the victim’s side, what was returned. For analysis, we retrieved what the server sends when the answer is yes.
What arrives when the answer is yes
When the server decides a target is worth attacking, the follow-on script does its work in three movements.
First, it makes Defender look the other way. It calls Add-MpPreference (with the cmdlet name split by a backtick, a small obfuscation to dodge naïve string-matching detections) to exclude %ProgramData% and %APPDATA% from scanning, exclude .exe, .msi, and .dll files from scanning, and exclude PowerShell, regasm.exe, rundll32.exe,msedge.exe, and chrome.exe from scanning. Only after that does it phone home—collecting a profile of the machine (Windows version, Active Directory domain, installed antivirus product), RSA-encrypting it with a public key embedded in the script, and sending it to opus-dsn[.]com inside a utm_content query parameter that looks, in any access log, like ordinary marketing tracking. This is the profile the operator uses to decide whether this particular machine is worth the next stage.
Second, it widens the gap. A second Add-MpPreference block extends the exclusion list to include the .png file extension and the conhost.exe process—the exact two additions the next stage will need. It then writes AmsiEnable=0 into HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows Script\Settings, disabling Windows’ Antimalware Scan Interface—the layer that normally lets Defender read scripts before they execute. After this point, the malicious activity is being conducted in folders, with file types, and through processes that Defender has been instructed to ignore.
Third, it stages persistence. It downloads a file called secret.png from https://captr.b-cdn[.]net/secret.png (a BunnyCDN URL that looks at a glance like any other content-delivery link) and saves it to C:\ProgramData\MicrosoftEdgeUpdate.png, a path chosen to sit beside Microsoft’s real browser-update folders. The file is not an image. It is an AES-256-CBC ciphertext (key and IV both derived via PBKDF2 with 10,000 iterations from a hardcoded passphrase) wrapping a .NET assembly. A scheduled task is then registered with the name MicrosoftEdgeUpdateTaskMachineCore{JBNEN-NQVNZJ-KJAN323-111}, which is all but indistinguishable at a glance from the real Microsoft Edge update task and set to fire at every logon, running unprivileged so it never produces a UAC prompt. The action it executes is conhost.exe --headless launching a hidden PowerShell, which decrypts the fake PNG in memory and reflectively loads the resulting .NET assembly into its own address space. Nothing lands on disk as an ordinary executable. All that persists is the encrypted image, in a folder Defender has been asked to ignore.
And then a second payload, that doesn’t persist at all. The script doesn’t stop there. After registering and starting the scheduled task, it sends a second beacon to confirm install, then runs an entirely separate block that downloads a second encrypted file (GGn.xml) from the same BunnyCDN host, decrypts it with a different, hardcoded AES key, and reflectively loads that assembly into the running PowerShell process too. The first payload survives reboots; this one runs once, in memory, and is gone. Two .NET assemblies, one campaign, on the victim.
What the payload is built to do
The decrypted assembly is a .NET stealer. We can characterize it from its own class and method names, which describe its job in plain English: it scans browsers, messaging apps, gaming platforms, FTP clients, and crypto wallets, collecting data labeled Logins, Cookies, Autofills, and FtpConnections.
In practice, that means every Chromium- and Firefox-based browser on the machine (Chrome, Edge, Brave, and others) gets stripped of saved passwords, autofill data (including saved credit cards), and the cookies that keep users signed in. Discord tokens, Telegram sessions, Steam logins, FTP credentials, and cryptocurrency wallet files are taken as well.
(Most of the exact target paths are obfuscated and only decrypted at runtime, so the specific apps aren’t all visible from a static analysis, but the categories of theft are clear from the class names.)
Session cookies are the part that should alarm most people, because they work faster than anything else. A stolen login cookie lets an attacker walk straight into a Gmail inbox or banking portal without needing a password or triggering two-factor authentication. As far as the website is concerned, the user is already signed in. The gap between infection and account takeover can be minutes.
Beyond data theft, the malware also imports Windows APIs used for clipboard hijacking and keystroke logging, tools that can capture what you type or swap a cryptocurrency wallet address at the exact moment you send funds.
It also includes the building blocks for “hidden desktop” tradecraft: creating a second, invisible Windows desktop that the attacker can capture and potentially control. In its most advanced form, this lets an attacker operate inside that hidden environment—logging in to accounts, approving transactions, or sending messages—while the victim’s real screen shows nothing unusual. For the duration of the infection, the attacker is, effectively, a second presence on the computer.
A new tool, a new lookalike, the same trap
The reason this campaign matters beyond the single installer is that its shape isn’t new. It’s a refined version of a pattern we’ve been watching for months: new AI products launch with huge attention, and within weeks, lookalike domains and trojanized installers appear alongside them. Antigravity is the latest example, but it won’t be the last.
The incentive for attackers is obvious. Every high-profile AI launch creates a surge of users who want to try it immediately, before they’ve had time to memorize the real URL, or might fail to double-check it against trusted sources.
What makes this style of campaign hard to spot is that most victims never know they were targeted. Those who escaped, because the operator chose not to escalate on their machine, have no reason to think anything happened.
The ones who didn’t escape usually find out later: a password reset they didn’t request, a friend asking about a strange message, or a bank balance that suddenly looks wrong. By then, the decision to target them was made days earlier.
What to do if you may have been affected
If you or anyone who shares your computer recently installed something calling itself Google Antigravity from anywhere other than antigravity.google, start by checking the network indicators. Look in firewall logs, EDR alerts, or your router logs for connections to opus-dsn[.]com, captr.b-cdn[.]net, or 89[.]124[.]96[.]27. A single connection from a PowerShell process is enough to confirm the check-in happened.
From a different, clean device, sign out of every active session on your important accounts: Google, Microsoft 365, any banking portal, GitHub, Discord, Telegram, Steam, and your crypto exchange. Most services have a “sign out everywhere” option under security settings.
Change passwords on those accounts, starting with your email. If your email is compromised, an attacker can reset almost anything else.
Rotate any API keys, SSH keys, or cloud credentials that were on the affected computer, not just the passwords attached to them.
If you have cryptocurrency wallets on the machine, move the funds from a clean device immediately. This is what these operators monetize first.
Watch your bank and credit card statements for unfamiliar charges, and consider placing a fraud alert with your bank.
Wipe and reinstall Windows. A machine that has run this class of malware should not be trusted.
If the machine is a work laptop, tell your IT or security team today. The beacon collects the machine’s Active Directory domain, so on a domain-joined corporate laptop, the attacker now knows which company’s network this victim belongs to, which means this isn’t just a personal problem.
An attachment in an email impersonating DHL about a shipment contains a link to a preconfigured SimpleHelp remote access tool—an ideal starting point for attackers to explore a network, steal data, and drop additional malware.
A German industrial spare parts and equipment supplier received an email pretending to be from DHL, claiming a shipment had arrived.
Given their line of business, I imagine they get this type of email all the time. But a few details stood out:
The sender’s email address did not belong to DHL,
the receiver address was the general info@ for the company,
the images in the email were hosted on ecp.yusercontent.com,
and, most importantly, there was attachment.
While the remote content is hosted on a legitimate Yahoo webpage commonly used to serve images and other content in Yahoo Mail, this is not something DHL typically uses.
The attachment, a PDF file called AWB-Doc0921.pdf is just a blurred image with a Microsoft-branded button that prompts the victim to “Continue” to access a secure file.
In reality, clicking the button downloads a file called AWB-Doc0921.scr from the domain longhungphatlogistics[.]vn, a domain belonging to a Vietnamese logistics company that was likely compromised to host malware.
Malwarebytes blocks longhungphatlogistics[.]vn
A .scr file is a Windows file, which is an executable (.exe) file used to launch screensavers. They are often used to hide malicious code because Windows trusts them, allowing them to bypass some security layers.
In this case, the file is a modified installer of a remote access tool signed by SimpleHelp.
UAC prompt for the signed installer
SimpleHelp is a remote support and remote monitoring and management (RMM) platform. It allows remote desktop control, file transfer, diagnostics, and unattended access. In the wrong hands, that’s effectively a support-style backdoor. Attackers can use it for reconnaissance, credential theft, lateral movement, defense evasion, and staging further malware, including ransomware. We’ve seen SimpleHelp abused in this way before.
This is basically a beaconing model. Once installed, the system connects out to the attacker’s server, which is more likely to be allowed through NAT and firewalls than inbound connections. Because the user initiated the install, the attacker gets immediate visibility of the system and can reconnect later whenever the service is running. In the case of a phish, that means the lure only has to get the victim to execute the file once. After that, the attacker’s console can show the new machine as a manageable asset.
For what seems to be a non-targeted attack, the campaign shows a decent level of sophistication by using legitimate components to trick targets into running the remote access tool.
How to stay safe
The good news: once you know what to look for, these attacks are much easier to spot and block. The bad news: they’re cheap, scalable, and will continue to circulate.
So, the next time a “PDF” prompts you to download a file, pause to think about what might be hiding under the hood.
Beyond avoiding unsolicited attachments, here are a few ways to stay safe:
Only access your accounts through official apps or by typing the official website directly into your browser.
Check file extensions carefully. Even if a file installs a legitimate tool, it may not be safe to run it.
Login
