Launching the expanded AI Classroom Toolkit with Cyberlite during Global Media and Information Literacy Week 

AI is opening new pathways to information, giving people faster access to answers, ideas, and knowledge. At the same time, it’s making it harder to know whether the content we see is authentic. 

Companies that build AI have a responsibility to make it reliable and trustworthy, and that responsibility doesn’t shift to the people who use it. But AI is already shaping how people search, learn, and encounter information. Helping people navigate that reality means building media and AI literacy (MAIL): the judgment to decide whether and how to use AI and what information to trust. These skills are as foundational as AI safety, and educators are asking for help teaching them. 

That’s why, during Global Media and Information Literacy Week, we’re launching the expanded AI Classroom Toolkit: Unlocking Generative AI Safely and Responsibly, created with the online safety organization Cyberlite. It’s part of Microsoft’s broader commitment to make sure AI strengthens human thinking rather than replaces it. It also reflects Microsoft’s focus on education and empowerment, a core pillar of our Safe Participation Framework. 

What’s new in the AI Classroom Toolkit

The expanded toolkit adds a deeper focus on critical thinking, verification, and media and AI literacy, helping students judge AI outputs and make informed decisions about what to trust online. Together with the original modules, it’s now a single, classroom-ready resource that covers the core of AI safety and literacy. Realistic, scenario-based lessons and activities help students practice these skills in situations they may encounter online: 

• The Climate Campaign: Gina enters an online challenge to make a campaign for a cause she cares about and finds that some winning entries use AI to show events that never happened. Students sort a feed of real and AI-made posts and practice lateral reading. The lesson: whether a post was made with AI doesn’t decide whether it’s trustworthy. What it claims, and who is behind it, does. 

• The Helpful Bot: Alex creates an AI help bot inside his online game, then catches it inventing details and collecting players’ personal information. Students learn why AI can get things wrong, how to trace claims to reliable sources, and why they’re responsible for AI-generated content they act on or share. 

• What Kind of AI User Are You?: An interactive quiz, hosted by Cyberlite, helps students identify their AI habits, strengths, and potential blind spots, and gives them an AI Type to reflect on and discuss. 

“When we created the first Classroom Toolkit: Unlocking Generative AI Safely and Responsibly with Microsoft in 2023, most of the conversation was about using AI safely. Today, the questions young people ask about AI have grown sharper and more personal, like what to believe online or how far to trust a chatbot’s answer,” said Michelle Yao, cofounder of Cyberlite. 

The toolkit also reflects what young people in our co-design sessions with Cyberlite told us: they want to learn by doing, through games, real-life scenarios, and peer discussion. Teachers don’t need to be AI experts, and students don’t need an AI tool in hand to start. 

That approach builds on the reach and results of the original toolkit. Since 2023, the first version has reached educators in 10 countries and 11 languages, including through government and partner learning platforms. In South Korea, 93% of participating educators reported improved knowledge and understanding of ethical issues, privacy, and bias related to AI. 

“Our hope is that every student leaves a little surer of their own judgment, and that everyone feels more confident deciding how AI fits into their lives,” said Yao. 

Literacy works alongside product design and policy

Education is one part of the equation. Our commitment to media and AI literacy also shows up in how we design products and the policies we support.  

Last month, we set out five principles for AI in education, including “AI designed to support students’ learning, not replace their thinking.” We also committed to enforceable privacy, safety, and transparency protections for qualifying educational AI products in US school districts. These protections help schools and families understand how these tools work and the controls available to them. 

Media and AI literacy is now a global priority

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has released a framework for a MAIL assessment beginning in 2029. As part of its Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), it will examine how students reflect on, analyze, and evaluate information, including AI-generated information. This week in New Delhi, UNESCO is also launching an AI extension of its “Think Critically, Click Wisely” global curriculum, which Microsoft advised on. 

This growing global focus makes the need for support urgent—educators want help, and many aren’t getting it. In Microsoft’s 2026 AI in Education report, 53% of educators and 77% of students say they haven’t had AI training.  

Closing this skills gap matters beyond the classroom. Healthy societies depend on a shared basis of facts, informed public debate, and confident civic participation. As authenticity gets harder to judge, there’s a risk that people start doubting everything, creating what the Digital Inquiry Group calls a “dangerous declaration of permanent uncertainty.” MAIL offers a way through. It builds the confidence to decide what to trust. 

Media and AI literacy for every age

Across Microsoft, we’re helping people build these skills wherever they learn and find information: 

• In classrooms: Students debate whether to accept, question, or rework an AI tool’s answers in an AI and Critical Thinking lesson from The Economist Educational Foundation, supported by Microsoft. Available alongside other media literacy lessons in Microsoft Learning Zone, the lesson has reached students in 116 countries. 

• Through play: Millions of players have checked sources, spotted bias, and cracked cases of AI misuse in Minecraft Education’s The Investigators and Reed Smart: AI Detective. 

• For content creators: UNESCO, with Microsoft’s support, is developing resources to help creator associations train their members in MAIL and is testing them with creators in Nairobi this week.  

• For voters: Check. Recheck. Vote. helps people apply AI literacy to election information. 

• In our products: Search Progress, built with input from the Digital Inquiry Group, turns research assignments into source-checking practice in Microsoft Teams for Education. 

What’s next 

Through Microsoft Elevate for Educators and local partners, we’ll bring the AI Classroom Toolkit to new audiences, with more languages and localized content rolling out through 2027. We’ll keep evolving it as technology and educators’ needs change. 

Explore the toolkit and supporting resources for educators today.  

AI will keep changing how people find information and the content they encounter. Our goal is to help people meet that change with confident, informed judgment about the AI they use and the information they trust so they can fully take part in civic and democratic life. 

The post In an age of AI, deciding what to trust is a foundational skill. Here’s how we’re helping educators teach it. appeared first on Microsoft On the Issues.

Why LinkedIn is challenging an overbroad government demand—and why Congress must make secrecy the exception

Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in LinkedIn’s (a Microsoft subsidiary) appeal challenging a government demand for user records and a related secrecy order that is preventing LinkedIn from notifying those users that the government is seeking their data. The appeal asks important, constitutional questions about whether service providers may challenge demands that sweep in records unrelated to an investigation, and when the government may prevent a provider from notifying the user of a request.  

This appeal continues Microsoft’s longstanding work to ensure that secrecy orders remain the exception, not the rule. LinkedIn’s appeal asks courts to enforce meaningful limits on both the scope of government demands and the secrecy that can accompany them. 

We recognize law enforcement’s important role in protecting public safety and investigating crime, and sometimes that does need to be done covertly. We respond to lawful legal requests. At the same time, customers and users deserve meaningful limits and independent oversight through an adversarial process. And, customers deserve to be notified when the government seeks their data, unless the government clearly establishes the need for secrecy under statutory and constitutional standards. 

Those safeguards fulfill basic constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment protects the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. That right applies to papers kept in a desk, and it also applies when personal and business records are stored online. Online service providers, like LinkedIn and Microsoft, also have a First Amendment right to speak to their customers when the government obtains an order to search their private information. Secrecy may sometimes be justified—but it should be tailored to demonstrated needs and subject to meaningful review.  

This particular case arose after LinkedIn received a court order seeking user records together with a secrecy order preventing LinkedIn from informing anyone about the order. The details remain under seal, including the nature of the information the government seeks and the people who own that information. But the Fourth Circuit partially unsealed LinkedIn’s opening brief in July, allowing the public to understand some of the core issues. LinkedIn argues that the demand is overbroad, the secrecy order is unconstitutional, and the government has violated LinkedIn’s due process by withholding evidence from LinkedIn. 

Three amicus briefs from a broad coalition support LinkedIn’s position. The American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Virginia argue that users’ privacy interests must inform whether a demand is reasonable and that providers may be the only practical means of challenging unlawful process because users often receive no notice. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press warns that overbroad demands, delayed notice, and secret evidence can expose confidential sources and chill newsgathering. Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and X emphasize that cloud providers are uniquely positioned to identify irrelevant requests and that secrecy orders require case-specific evidence rather than boilerplate assertions. Together, these briefs show why cloud providers must be able to test both the scope of government demands and the need for secrecy. 

Microsoft has a long record of standing up for these principles. In 2014, Microsoft successfully challenged a secrecy order connected to a National Security Letter that prevented notice to an enterprise customer. In 2016, we filed a landmark challenge to the widespread use of indefinite secrecy orders. We’ve successfully challenged individual secrecy orders time and again over the years. Our efforts contributed to updated Justice Department policies, but executive-branch practices can change. Durable protections require the development of case law and legislation. 

The U.S. House of Representatives recently took an important step in that direction. On August 31, the House passed legislation to rein in secret surveillance and strengthen notice protections when the government seeks data held by technology providers. As we explained when the bill passed, the reforms would place clearer limits on secrecy orders, require greater accountability, and help ensure that secrecy is the exception – not the rule. The Senate should act promptly to send these historic reforms to the President. 

The House –passed legislation recognizes that privacy and public safety are not opposing values. Clear standards can give investigators the confidentiality they genuinely need while providing courts, providers, and customers with predictable rules. The pending legislation and LinkedIn’s appeal are the latest, complementary chapters in this broader effort. Legislation can establish durable, system-wide rules for notice and accountability. Courts must meanwhile enforce the limits already contained in existing statutes and the Constitution. Neither task requires obstructing legitimate investigations. Rather, both mean the government must seek only relevant information, justify secrecy with specific evidence, and infringe on speech to the least extent possible. 

That is why today’s argument matters beyond a single sealed investigation. People and organizations increasingly entrust their most sensitive information to online services. If providers cannot challenge demands they know are overbroad—or if courts may silence them without a rigorous, adversarial review—the safeguards the law requires will be weakened precisely when they are most needed.

Microsoft and LinkedIn will continue to support lawful investigations while standing up for customer privacy, transparency, and the rule of law. We have appealed to the Fourth Circuit to preserve providers’ ability to challenge overbroad demands and to require the government to meet its constitutional burden before imposing secrecy. And we urge the Senate to complete the work the House began by enacting durable non-disclosure order reform.

Further reading 

• House passes historic reforms to rein in secret surveillance 

• New success in protecting customer rights unsealed today 

• Keeping secrecy the exception, not the rule 

• DOJ acts to curb the overuse of secrecy orders. Now it’s Congress’ turn. 

• DOJ’s newly released recommended practices are a win for cloud and enterprise customers 

• Ensuring secrecy orders are the exception not the rule when the government seeks data owned by our customers 

• The need for legislative reform on secrecy orders 

• Freedom is built on the protection of privacy | Episode 2 

The post Protecting customer privacy means standing up for transparency appeared first on Microsoft On the Issues.

As Americans prepare to vote this November, artificial intelligence is changing how many people find and understand election information. 

Some voters are deliberately turning to AI tools with questions about candidates, ballot measures, election procedures, and issues that matter to their communities. Others are encountering AI-generated summaries at the top of search results. In either case, AI is increasingly becoming a front door to election information. 

This shift is happening quickly. More than 30% of the U.S. working-age population now uses AI (Microsoft AI Diffusion Index, Q1 2026; Microsoft, AI Adoption Across the United States). These tools can help people understand complicated topics, compare information, and explore unfamiliar issues. But election information can also present some challenges for AI. It is highly local, changes quickly, and can be incomplete, contested, or stripped of essential context. 

The answer is not to steer voters away from AI, it is to help people use it wisely, particularly when the information may influence aspects of their voting experience, such as how, when, and where they cast their ballot. 

That is why, on National Voter Registration Day, a day when our brands and products come together to encourage civic participation, we’re launching the next phase of our voter education initiative, Check. Recheck. Vote. This year, the campaign will equip voters with practical AI literacy skills for the 2026 election season.  

Check. Recheck. Vote.

We launched Check. Recheck. Vote. in 2024 to help voters recognize the risks posed by deceptive AI-generated content. Deepfakes and other deceptive media remain a serious concern. But in conversations with voters and election organizations, we are also hearing about a broader and more immediate challenge. Millions of people now encounter election information through AI-generated answers, and many are not sure how to determine whether those answers are current, complete, or reliable. 

The updated campaign gives voters three straightforward steps: 

• Check the sources and citations behind an AI-generated answer. Look for where the information came from, who published it, and when it was last updated. Be cautious when an answer provides no sources. 

• Recheck important details by visiting the original sources and comparing what other credible sources say. This is especially important for fast-changing or location-specific information. 

• Vote based on current information from your state or local election website, including official guidance on registration, voting options, deadlines, and polling locations. 

At the center of the campaign is a new 75-second video that shows how an AI-generated answer can appear during an ordinary election-related search, explains where these answers can fall short, and offers simple steps voters can take before relying on them. 

The campaign website pairs the video with practical guidance and links to authoritative election resources, including state-by-state voting information and tools for educators.  

We are working with the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) and the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) to scale the reach of this campaign across all fifty states and the territories and to point voters to accurate information directly from state and local election officials so they can participate with confidence. 

We believe that civics and voter education start well before a citizen is old enough to vote. That’s why we are also investing in efforts to extend AI voter literacy education in the classroom. The campaign website includes a classroom activity to help students examine how AI may shape the election information they encounter, practice verifying claims, and keep their own judgment at the center of the process. We are also amplifying our impact on this important issue by supporting the News Literacy Project. 

We’re also proud to announce today that, in partnership with iCivics, we are launching Village Square – a new Minecraft Education civic learning experience that helps students explore how communities make decisions and solve shared challenges. The game brings concepts such as dialogue, participation, and collective decision-making to life through immersive gameplay. Village Square gives educators and families an engaging, nonpartisan way to help young people practice listening to different perspectives, weighing trade-offs and working together to build stronger communities. 

Finally, we know that credible local reporting remains essential to informed civic participation, and that reporting is under strain in many communities. 

In Washington state, Microsoft is partnering with the Associated Press Fund for Journalism to expand election coverage for 10 local newsrooms operating 14 news websites. Participating newsrooms receive access to AP election results and race calls, vote tabulations, state-specific maps and graphics, and resources that help local journalists connect national and statewide developments to the communities they serve. 

The newsrooms represent communities from Seattle to Spokane and the Wenatchee Valley. Their work complements the reporting of the Associated Press, helping trusted, fact-based election coverage and results reach communities that might otherwise lack access. 

This investment reflects a broader reality. Voters need more than information. They need reliable sources that can provide context, ask hard questions, correct mistakes, and explain what national developments mean at the local level. 

Microsoft’s Support for the 2026 Midterms

Voters aren’t the only ones navigating this AI moment, so are the people running campaigns and conducting elections, all while facing an increasingly complex cybersecurity landscape. Microsoft has long supported the security and resilience of campaigns and elections. In 2018, we launched AccountGuard to help political campaigns and democracy-focused organizations defend against cyberattacks, and during the 2024 election cycle we joined dozens of other technology companies in the Tech Accord to Combat Deceptive Use of AI in 2024 Elections. Here’s how that commitment continues today: 

Equipping election officials. With The Elections Group, International IDEA, Ready for Tuesday and Arizona State University’s Mechanics of Democracy Lab, we launched the free, open-source AI + Elections Skills Hub: prompts, sample AI agents, and draft policies for responsible adoption. It’s already reached 1,000+ officials across 45 states. 

Strengthening cybersecurity. We’ve deployed Microsoft Sentinel to several state and local election offices for stronger threat detection, and we’re also supporting select election and political stakeholders with MDASH to find and fix software vulnerabilities faster. 

Countering bomb hoaxes. More than 300 emailed bomb hoaxes disrupted polling places in 2024. In response, we’ve started a new Elections Bomb Threats Task Force alongside partners Social Scout, Nisos, and the Committee for Safe and Secure Elections (CSSE) to bring together digital intelligence and law enforcement expertise to track & share trends and reduce disruptions. An initial report on the hoaxes encountered in 2024 will shape our approach for 2026. 

Supporting campaigns. Built with Defending Digital Campaigns, our Secure AI Toolkit for Campaigns has reached 3,000+ campaigns and political stakeholders with practical AI guardrails. Our Campaign Technology team has also trained thousands of candidates, staff, and officials from both parties on responsible AI use and cybersecurity best practices. 

The technology continues to change, but our approach remains consistent: help voters find authoritative information and make informed judgments, help campaigns and election authorities defend against evolving threats, and help the election community adopt technology that strengthens security, accountability, and civic participation. This work is bipartisan by design, and it includes: 

• Azure for Elections – prioritized support and security for elections-critical cloud workloads 

• M365 for Campaigns – secure, cost-effective collaboration and email for candidates and campaigns 

• Deceptive AI in Elections Reporting – malicious deepfakes of candidates and election officials are disallowed on Microsoft platforms, and targeted individuals can report them directly 

• Content Provenance – Microsoft image generation products affix content provenance to images, with LinkedIn displaying that provenance to users 

• Civic engagement – continuing our long-standing work to promote civic engagement through our own products and partnerships 

The 2026 election will be the first U.S. federal election in which generative AI is part of the everyday environment for millions of voters as well as those who support the political process. That creates new risks, but it also gives us an opportunity to equip people with skills that will remain valuable well beyond a single election. 

The post 2026 midterm elections: Helping voters navigate election information in the age of AI appeared first on Microsoft On the Issues.