The early weeks of 2026 have already made one thing clear: Government cybersecurity is in a new phase, shaped not by incremental change, but by the rapid integration of AI into core public-sector missions. AI systems are now embedded in critical infrastructure, federal service delivery, research environments, as well as state and local operations. At the same time, nation-state adversaries are leveraging AI to accelerate intrusion, scale deception and manipulate trusted systems in ways not possible even a year ago.

As Senior Vice President of Public Sector at Palo Alto Networks, I see a decisive shift underway. Defending the public sector in 2026 means navigating a world where security depends on verifying identity, securing data and governing AI-driven systems that act without human intervention. Success now hinges on architectures that assume automation, operations that prioritize coordination, and governance frameworks capable of managing AI at mission scale.

Here are the developments that will define the year ahead.

Federal Government

1. AI-Native Security Must Become Integral to Federal Operations

AI in federal environments is no longer an experiment. Agencies are now designing workflows, SOC missions and cloud architectures around AI-driven detection and response. The emphasis is shifting from supplementing human analysts to building systems that maintain visibility, correlate threats, and respond autonomously when human capacity is limited. This builds on what we forecasted last year, when federal cybersecurity teams began using AI to replace manual workflows and drive down detection and response times.

The shift will be practical. Federal teams must plan to deploy AI systems that correlate logs, identify behavioral anomalies, prioritize threats, and suppress noise before analysts ever see an alert. Manual, ticket-based workflows will no longer meet federal timelines for investigation or reporting, particularly as adversaries automate more phases of attack.

2. Identity Emerges as the Central Federal Security Challenge

The biggest shift in 2026 will be the collapse between “identity” and “attack surface.” Deepfake technologies now operate in real time. AI-generated voices and video can impersonate senior leaders at a level undetectable by traditional controls. Machine identities continue to proliferate; they will outnumber human identities this year. And autonomous agents can initiate high-impact actions without human oversight. This reflects a broader crisis of authenticity now reshaping how enterprises defend identity itself.

Identity abuse will no longer be limited to credential theft. This turns identity into a systemic risk. One compromised identity (human, machine or agent) can cascade through automated systems with little friction. Federal programs will need to prioritize continuous identity verification, stronger proofing and governance frameworks that validate the legitimacy of both human and AI-driven activity.

3. AI Systems Must Be Secure-by-Design

Stemming from the clear mandate in the AI Action Plan (and subsequent work by NIST to develop an AI/Cyber Profile on top of the existing Cybersecurity Framework) agencies will steadily integrate AI security into their deployment of AI technologies.

This imperative is critical as AI systems are susceptible to novel threats. Data poisoning of training sets, manipulated inputs and hidden instructions in untrusted datasets compromise the intelligence that agencies rely on for analysis, planning and mission support. To support the security of this AI-first moment, Palo Alto Networks was proud to make its AI security platform, Prisma^® AIRS™, available through the GSA OneGov initiative.

4. Nation-State Operations Expand Through AI Automation

Adversaries will use AI to compress the time between reconnaissance, exploitation and lateral movement. We expect rapidly increasing the use of AI to chain vulnerabilities, tailor social engineering campaigns, and generated malware variants that adapt in real time.

The focus will broaden beyond IT networks. AI will be used to disrupt OT systems and target sensitive research environments. Foreign intelligence services will weaponize AI to blur the line between intrusion and information operations, producing hybrid campaigns that attack both systems and the legitimacy of institutions.

5. Autonomous SOC Capabilities Become Essential

Federal SOCs will evolve from human-centered command centers to hybrid operations where autonomous agents run major components of the detection and response mission. These agents will triage alerts, enforce containment, and initiate predefined responses.

This evolution comes with risk. AI agents with broad authority can be misused or manipulated if not properly governed. Agencies will need safeguards to track agent behavior, enforce least privilege on agents, and prevent misuse through runtime monitoring and “AI firewall” controls designed to stop malicious prompts and unauthorized actions. The same pressures are shaping enterprise security, where controls like AI firewalls and circuit breaker mechanisms are becoming standard practice. Automation will only strengthen federal security if paired with rigorous oversight and continuous validation of agent activity.

6. Shared and Federated SOC Structures Gain Momentum

As threats scale, agencies will increasingly operate through shared or federated security structures. Instead of isolated SOCs, agencies will adopt analytics layers capable of correlating activity across departments and exchanging findings in real time.

This shift will reduce redundancy and provide faster insight into nation-state campaigns that cross federal boundaries. Early adopters will establish shared analytic and response frameworks that allow agencies to coordinate without sacrificing mission-specific control. Civilian agencies will lead early adoption with broader participation across defense and national security stakeholders expected later in the year.

7. The Post-Quantum Deadline Becomes Immediate

In 2026, post-quantum cryptography planning will move to implementation. Accelerated advances in quantum computing and AI-based cryptanalysis will push agencies to transition from pilot efforts to mandated modernization.

Agencies will focus on discovering where vulnerable algorithms are used, replacing outdated libraries, and implementing crypto-agility so systems can evolve without major redesigns. Systems with unpatchable cryptographic components will be flagged for full replacement, forcing agencies to reconcile years of accumulated “crypto debt.”

8. Data Trust and Cloud Workload Protection Become Priority Missions

The rise of AI workloads will force agencies to rethink how they protect data. Infrastructure controls alone cannot detect when training data has been manipulated or when model outputs no longer reflect real-world conditions.

Agencies will unify developer and security workflows and use tools like Data Security Posture Management and AI security posture management (AI-SPM) to track data lineage and enforce protections at runtime. Enterprises are addressing the same issue by bringing development and security teams together under shared data governance models. Ensuring model trustworthiness will become a mission-support requirement, not just a security objective.

9. Platform Consolidation Becomes Necessary

Fragmented tools cannot support the visibility and oversight required for AI governance. Executives will push for platform consolidation to unify network, identity, cloud, endpoint and AI security. Integrated platforms will gain favor because they enable consistent policy enforcement and a single operational picture across increasingly automated environments.

State, Local and Educational Institutions

1. AI Adoption Splits SLED into Distinct Tiers

In 2026, disparities in funding and technical capacity will widen. Some states will deploy AI across security operations, citizen services and identity verification. Others will struggle to maintain legacy systems.

Well-resourced jurisdictions will reduce response times and improve resilience. Underfunded ones will remain exposed to ransomware and disruption. Without targeted modernization efforts, a national divide in SLED cybersecurity maturity will deepen.

2. Regional Models Become the Practical Path Forward

Silos are no longer sustainable. SLED organizations will rely on shared SOCs, regional threat intelligence hubs and coordinated incident response agreements. States will formalize partnerships to share expertise, reduce costs and defend interconnected systems. This evolution represents the maturation of the “team sport” mentality we predicted in 2025. These models reflect operational reality: Compromised data or infrastructure in one jurisdiction often creates immediate risk for its neighbors.

3. Higher Education Redesigns Its Security Baseline

Universities will classify cybersecurity alongside energy, research infrastructure and physical security as essential institutional functions. Secure browser adoption, stronger vendor oversight and centralized identity governance will become the norm.

AI research environments will receive increased scrutiny, and universities participating in federally funded research will face stricter compliance requirements to prevent data poisoning and model manipulation. Institutions with large research portfolios will prioritize securing lab environments where AI models are trained and evaluated.

4. K–12 Systems Enter a New Phase of Security Oversight

States will introduce new security mandates for K–12 environments, covering MFA, network segmentation, secure browsers, identity verification and foundational zero trust principles. AI-enabled ransomware will remain a threat. Smaller districts will adopt managed services or regional support structures as they confront growing operational and compliance demands. Districts that modernize identity controls and browser security will significantly reduce their exposure compared to those reliant on legacy tools. Building on the regulatory momentum we predicted in 2025, K–12 institutions will continue moving from defensive posture to proactive security adoption.

5. Local Governments Face Escalating AI-Driven Ransomware

Municipal governments remain high-value targets due to limited staffing and aging infrastructure. AI gives threat actors the ability to automate reconnaissance, craft targeted phishing messages, and identify vulnerabilities with little effort.

Attacks timed to public safety incidents or weather emergencies will increase, meaning local governments will need stronger identity controls, automated endpoint protection and access to managed detection and response. Operational continuity will depend on reducing time-to-detect and time-to-contain, capabilities that smaller municipalities cannot achieve without external support.

6. Managed Services and Platform Consolidation Become Standard

As technical demands grow, SLED organizations will move toward managed SOC models and consolidated vendor ecosystems. Platforms that integrate data protection, threat detection, identity governance and AI oversight will gain traction. Point tools without interoperability will decline. Budget-constrained environments will favor comprehensive platforms that reduce operational burden and simplify compliance.

7. Identity and Data Trust Become Central SLED Priorities

SLED organizations manage sensitive student records, election data and social services information. These environments are increasingly strained by the rapid growth of machine identities and AI-driven applications.

Synthetic identities and AI-generated credentials will be used to infiltrate systems with limited oversight. Continuous identity verification, data lineage tracking and posture management will become essential to prevent fraud, service disruption and data manipulation. Identity assurance and data integrity will become the foundation of public trust at the state and local level.

The post 2026 Public Sector Cyber Outlook: Identity, AI and the Fight for Trust appeared first on Palo Alto Networks Blog.

How Ripley's Fight for Survival Became My Blueprint for SOC Transformation

I'll admit it. I wasn't planning to rewatch science fiction horror films when I sat down to write about modern cybersecurity challenges. But there I was, staring at yet another draft about SOC modernization when our content team threw out a wild idea: What if we explained threat actors through the lens of a Science Fiction movie like Alien?

Yo, Hicks. I think we got something here!

Against my better judgment, I queued up the original 1979 film. Somewhere between the chest-burster scene and Ripley's desperate attempt to purge the Nostromo's systems, it hit me: This crew had every problem a modern security operations center faces daily.

Stay with me here.

The Unknown Threat Aboard Your Ship

In the original Alien, the crew of the Nostromo responds to what they think is a distress signal. Spoiler alert: It's not. By the time they realize they've brought something deadly aboard, it's already loose in the ship's ventilation system, moving freely through areas they can't monitor.

Sound familiar? That's exactly how modern breaches unfold. Threat actors don't announce themselves with flashing lights and alarm bells. They exploit a vulnerability, establish a foothold, and move laterally through your environment while remaining undetected. According to recent Unit 42^® research, the mean time to exfiltrate has dropped from nine days in 2021 to just two days in 2023. Some incidents now occur in under 30 minutes. The xenomorph's (the alien’s) rapid lifecycle has nothing on modern ransomware operators.

The Nostromo crew's problem wasn't just the alien. It was that their ship's systems couldn't tell them where the threat actually was. Their motion trackers picked up movement, but couldn't distinguish between crew members, the cat or the xenomorph. Legacy SIEM systems have the same problem, generating thousands of alerts without the context to determine which ones represent actual threats.

"I Can't Lie About Your Chances, But You Have My Sympathies"

One of the most chilling moments in Alien comes when Ash, the science officer, reveals he's actually a synthetic programmed by the company to prioritize retrieving the alien specimen over crew survival. "I can't lie to you about your chances, but... you have my sympathies."

This is what alert fatigue feels like in a modern SOC.

Security teams face an overwhelming reality:

• Managing up to 45 different security tools on average.
• Coordinating responses across approximately 19 different consoles.
• Processing thousands of alerts daily, most of which are false positives.
• 66% of organizations use 25 or fewer security products yet still struggle with complexity.

Like the Nostromo crew discovering their systems were working against them, security analysts often find their tools generate more noise than signal. Traditional SIEMs bombard teams with redundant alerts while real threats slip through undetected. Analysts spend their days triaging false positives instead of hunting actual threats. Basically, they’re sorting through motion tracker pings while the xenomorph stalks the corridors.

The Company Knew (And Your Attack Surface Knows Too)

From Aliens (the 1986 sequel), we learn that the Weyland-Yutani Corporation knew about the xenomorph threat all along. They had information about LV-426, but that intelligence never reached the colonists who needed it. The result? An entire colony was lost because critical threat intelligence wasn't properly shared and acted upon.

This is the attack surface management problem in a nutshell.

You can't protect what you can't see. Like the colonial marines arriving at LV-426 with incomplete intelligence, security teams often lack comprehensive visibility across their cloud environments, hybrid infrastructures and sprawling IoT deployments.

Modern attack surface management addresses this:

• Providing continuous assessment of your external attack surface.
• Identifying abandoned, rogue or misconfigured assets before attackers find them.
• Monitoring for vulnerable systems proactively.
• Unifying visibility across network, endpoint, cloud and identity.

Think of it as having the schematics and sensor data Ripley desperately needed – a complete picture of where threats could hide and how they might move through your environment.

The Power Loader Moment: Amplifying Human Response with Automation

In the climactic scene of Aliens, Ripley straps into a power loader exosuit to fight the alien queen. She's still human, still making the decisions, but now she's augmented with technology that amplifies her capabilities and response speed.

This is exactly what AI-driven security operations should do.

Legacy SIEM is like facing the xenomorph queen with your bare hands. Modern AI-driven platforms are the power loader, they don't replace the human operator, but they dramatically amplify what that human can accomplish.

Platforms like Cortex XSIAM^® can process over 1 million events per second while reducing the number of incidents requiring human investigation to single digits per day. The technology handles the heavy lifting:

• Automated data integration and normalization across all security tools
• Machine learning models that detect anomalies in user behavior
• Intelligent alert correlation that groups related events into single incidents
• Automated response workflows that contain threats in minutes, not hours

Organizations using AI-driven SOC platforms report automating up to 98% of Tier 1 operations. Your analysts still make the critical decisions, they're just equipped with vastly better tools to execute those decisions at machine speed.

The Danger of Fragmented Systems

Throughout the Alien franchise, crew members are constantly struggling with fragmented information. The motion tracker shows movement, but not identity. The door controls are on a different system than life support. Communications are spotty. When seconds count, they're wasting precious time switching between systems and trying to piece together incomplete information.

This is the daily reality in most security operations centers.

The same attack generates alerts in multiple interfaces: your SIEM, EDR console, cloud security platform, identity provider. It’s like seeing the xenomorph's tail in one system, hearing its hiss in another, and detecting acid blood in a third, but never getting the full picture until it's too late.

The engineering challenge isn't just buying better sensors. It's creating a unified data foundation where security-relevant information is collected, stored and normalized together. When all your security data lives in a single data lake, AI models can recognize patterns that would never surface in siloed systems. It’s like understanding that the motion tracker ping, the door malfunctioning and the broken steam pipe are all connected to the same threat.

What this unified approach enables:

• Cross-data analytics that correlate threats across different data sources.
• Complete context of an attack from initial entry to lateral movement.
• Automated response that addresses root causes, not just symptoms.
• Seamless collaboration between SOC analysts, threat hunters and incident responders.

"Nuke It From Orbit! It's the Only Way to Be Sure"

In Aliens, the solution to an overwhelming infestation is drastic: orbital bombardment. While we don't recommend that approach for cybersecurity (your compliance team will object), there's a lesson here about the importance of decisive, automated response.

When the colonial marines discover the scope of the xenomorph infestation, their problem isn't just detection, it's that their response capabilities can't match the threat's speed and scale. By the time they've cleared one corridor, the aliens have flanked them through the ceiling.

Modern threats move at similar speeds. Attackers can pivot from initial compromise to data exfiltration faster than human analysts can investigate and coordinate responses across multiple tools. This is where automation becomes essential, not as a replacement for human judgment, but as the mechanism that executes decisions at the speed threats actually move.

The key is having the right response capabilities:

• Fast enough to outpace attacker movement.
• Comprehensive enough to address root causes.
• Automated enough to execute without human bottlenecks.
• Intelligent enough to avoid collateral damage.

You don't need to nuke your network from orbit. You need response automation that contains threats before they spread.

The Survivor (And Why Human Expertise Still Matters)

Ellen Ripley survives the Alien franchise through a combination of factors: technical competence, situational awareness, decisive action and refusal to give up. But here's what's critical. She's effective not because she's superhuman, but because she's highly trained, learns from experience, and adapts her approach as threats evolve.

The same principles apply to security operations.

AI and automation dramatically improve efficiency and response times, but skilled security professionals remain essential. The goal isn't to replace analysts. It's to free them from repetitive tasks so they can focus on what humans do best: creative problem-solving, threat hunting, strategic thinking.

The cybersecurity labor shortage continues to grow, and analysts experience burnout from manual processes that consume time better spent on high-value activities. Modern platforms address this by automating routine work while augmenting human decision-making. Instead of spending hours manually correlating events and switching between consoles, analysts receive high-fidelity incidents with complete context.

Ripley didn't survive because she had the best equipment (though the power loader helped). She survived because she understood the threat, adapted her tactics, and made smart decisions under pressure. Your security team needs the same combination: World-class tools that amplify their capabilities and free them to do the strategic thinking that actually stops sophisticated threats.

What Ripley Would Do With Modern SecOps

Imagine what the Nostromo crew could have done if they had access to modern security operations technology:

• Detected the alien's presence immediately through behavioral analytics instead of relying on motion trackers.
• Tracked its movement through integrated sensor data across the entire ship.
• Automatically sealed compartments and adjusted life support to contain the threat.
• Had complete visibility into every system, eliminating hiding spots and blind spots.

Your organization shouldn't face threats with 1970s technology while attackers use 2025 capabilities. The evolution from traditional log management to AI-driven security operations isn't just about buying new tools. It's about fundamentally transforming how your security team operates, moving from reactive alert management to proactive threat hunting, from fragmented tools to unified platforms, from manual response to intelligent automation.

The xenomorph was a perfect organism: efficient, deadly, focused solely on survival and reproduction. Modern threat actors are similarly evolved, using AI and automation to attack at machine speed. Your defenses need to match that evolution.

In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream, But Your SOC Platform Can

Modern security operations require more than collecting logs and hoping someone notices the anomalies. You need unified visibility, AI-driven analytics and automated response capabilities that can keep pace with threats that move at the speed of code.

Whether you're drowning in alerts, struggling with tool sprawl, or trying to defend against attackers moving faster than human reaction times, there's a better way forward. And unlike the Nostromo crew, you don't have to face it alone with outdated equipment and fragmented systems.

Just comprehensive security, delivered at the speed of AI.

Because in cybersecurity, everyone can hear you scream when your SIEM fails. The question is whether your security operations platform can stop the threat before it gets that far.

Take the Next Step

If you're ready to move from fragmented tools to unified security operations, download our whitepaper, Endpoint First: Charting the Course to AI-Driven Security Operations to break down the practical steps to get there.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Stop Drowning in Alerts (AKA: Your SIEM Shouldn't Feel Like a Motion Tracker): Legacy Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems generate thousands of alerts without the necessary context. The modern approach requires moving past redundant alerts to a system that can accurately distinguish between noise and actual threats, a necessity driven by the rapidly decreasing time attackers take to exfiltrate data.
2. Get the Full Ship Schematics (Because You Can't Fight What You Can't See): Many organizations lack comprehensive visibility across their environments (cloud, hybrid, IoT). A unified approach, which includes continuous attack surface management and a single data foundation, is essential to connect disparate alerts and gain a complete picture of an attack across all security tools.
3. Give Your Analysts a Power Loader (Not a Pink Slip): AI-driven security operations (SecOps) platforms do not replace human analysts but dramatically amplify their capabilities and response speed, enabling automated data integration, intelligent alert correlation and rapid response workflows to contain threats at "machine speed" before human bottlenecks are reached.

The post What the Alien Franchise Taught Me About Cybersecurity appeared first on Palo Alto Networks Blog.

Modernizing Vulnerability Sharing for a New Class of Threats

In cybersecurity, vulnerability information sharing frameworks have long assumed that conventional threats exploit flaws in software or systems, and they can be resolved with patches or configuration updates. AI and machine learning (ML) models upend that premise as adversarial attacks, like poisoning and evasion, target the unique way AI models process information. Consequently, the risks for AI systems include tactics like model poisoning (from evasion attacks) in datasets and training, which are not conventional software vulnerabilities. These new vulnerabilities fall outside the scope of traditional cybersecurity taxonomies like the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) Program.

There is a need to bridge the gap between the existing cybersecurity vulnerability sharing structure and burgeoning efforts to catalog security risks to AI systems. Provisions in the White House AI Action Plan, which Palo Alto Networks supports, call for the creation of an AI Information Sharing and Analysis Center (AI-ISAC), reinforcing the importance of addressing that disconnect. This integration is essential, as leveraging the existing, widely adopted cybersecurity infrastructure will be the fastest path to ensuring these new standards are accepted and operationalized.

Established Construct for Vulnerability Management and Disclosure

The global cybersecurity community relies on a mature infrastructure for sharing standardized vulnerability intelligence. Central to this ecosystem is the CVE List, established in 1999 as the authoritative catalog of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Through CVE IDs and a network of CVE Numbering Authorities (CNAs), this framework enables consistent vulnerability documentation and disclosure.

Similarly, the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) provides standardized severity assessments, allowing security teams to prioritize responses. Together with resources like the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and CISA’s KEV Catalog catalog, these tools form the backbone of global vulnerability management, information sharing and coordinated disclosure.

Why AI Breaks the Traditional Model

While this infrastructure has served the cybersecurity community effectively for over two decades, it was designed around traditional threat models that AI systems substantially upend. Attacks on AI systems represent a critical departure from traditional cybersecurity threats as they operate insidiously, subtly corrupting core reasoning processes, causing persistent, systemic failures, some of which only become evident over time. Most traditional cybersecurity tools are not equipped to recognize those breakdowns because they assume deterministic behavior and rules-based logic. AI systems defy those assumptions because AI is probabilistic, not deterministic. Consequently, attacks on AI models may remain hidden for extended periods.

Unlike traditional cybersecurity threats that target code, adversarial AI attacks target the underlying data and algorithms that govern how AI systems learn, reason and make decisions. Consider the following predominant adversarial attack methodologies on machine learning:

• Poisoning attacks inject malicious data into training datasets, corrupting the model's learning process and creating deliberate vulnerabilities or degraded performance.
• Inference-related attacks exploit model outputs to extract sensitive information or learn about its training data. This includes model inversion, which reconstructs sensitive data from the model's outputs, as well as membership inference, which identifies whether specific data points were used in training.

The expansion of existing security frameworks and programs is necessary to cover the enumeration, disclosure and downstream management of security risks to AI systems.

Advancing AI Security Through the AI Action Plan

In July, the Administration unveiled the AI Action Plan, an innovation-first framework balancing AI advancement with security imperatives. The Plan prioritizes Secure-by-Design AI technologies and applications, strengthened critical infrastructure cybersecurity and protection of commercial and government AI innovations.

Notably, it recommends establishing an AI Information Sharing and Analysis Center (AI-ISAC) to facilitate threat intelligence sharing across U.S. critical infrastructure sectors and encourages sharing known AI vulnerabilities, “tak[ing] advantage of existing cyber vulnerability sharing mechanisms.” These provisions affirm that AI security underpins American leadership in the field and, where possible, should be built upon existing frameworks.

Redefining Boundaries for AI Threats

To position the CVE Program for the AI-driven future, Palo Alto Networks is engaging directly with industry and program stakeholders to chart the path forward. Traditionally, the CVE Program serves as an ecosystem-wide central warning system. It provides a unified source of truths for security risks. A security risk catalog and identification system are needed for AI systems, as they currently fall outside the traditional scope of the CVE Program that has focused exclusively on vulnerabilities rather than on malicious components. The historical aperture of the current CVE Program excludes harmful artifacts, such as backdoored AI models or poisoned datasets, which represent fundamentally different attack vectors, in turn creating security blind spots.

Securing AI’s Promise

The United States leads in AI innovation and must equally lead in securing it. As momentum builds behind the AI Action Plan and the establishment of the AI-ISAC, we have a critical window to shape information sharing frameworks of the future. The goal is to ensure that cybersecurity and AI security infrastructure advance in unison with the technology itself. Integrating new AI vulnerability standards into trusted frameworks like the CVE Program aligns with industry focus and needs. Through proactive, coordinated action, we can unlock AI’s full promise while safeguarding the models that are embedded in the critical systems on which our nation depends.

The post Bridging Cybersecurity and AI appeared first on Palo Alto Networks Blog.

If 2025 proved anything, it’s that no one wins alone in cybersecurity. AI-driven threats accelerated, and environments grew more complex while enterprises pushed hard for simplicity, integrated protection and security outcomes that deliver measurable results and meaningful value.

In response, we saw our partners around the globe lean into integration, treat AI as a built-in advantage and use the strength of our ecosystem as a force multiplier. The result: What could have been a disruptive year instead became one defined by growth and learning across our partner community.

Now, those lessons are guiding how Palo Alto Networks plans to partner with even greater precision in 2026. We remain a channel-first company that’s all-in on our ecosystem and united with our partners in a shared purpose to protect our customers’ digital future. But we also intend to double down in several areas in the year ahead, and we’re asking our partners to join us in doing the same.

1. Simplifying Security Through Integration

One message from customers that came through loud and clear in 2025 is that complexity is the enemy of resilience. Many enterprises are grappling with tool sprawl – multiple consoles, disconnected policies and overlapping investments that slow down their teams when speed and agility matter most.

The partners who delivered some of the most transformative results for organizations this year were those who chose integration over complexity and collaboration over siloed tools. With a laser focus on simplifying security, they were able to help customers:

• Consolidate fragmented point tools onto a unified security platform.
• Align visibility across the network, cloud and security operations center (SOC), so teams can respond faster.
• Build architectures with zero trust and AI-powered detection at the core.

We saw this simplifying-security trend through integration across our ecosystem. Partners unified cloud security and detection workflows through Cortex^® Cloud™ and Cortex. Teams modernized network architectures with tighter integration across our platform. We expect this activity to only accelerate in the coming year as our cloud security offerings continue to evolve.

When we innovate together, customers gain stronger defenses and a faster time-to-value. That’s why Palo Alto Networks has invested so heavily in platformization. When you connect our capabilities across network security, cloud security and security operations (wrapping them with your consulting, delivery and managed services) customers can experience something fundamentally better. With fewer gaps and clearer signals, they can build a security posture that’s built for the speed of modern threats.

In 2026, deep integration will remain a cornerstone of how we partner with precision. We’ll continue aligning our portfolio, programs and joint engagement model, so you can build offerings that reduce complexity for customers and create stronger differentiation for your business.

2. Making AI a Built-in Advantage

At Palo Alto Networks, our approach to AI in cybersecurity is straightforward. We believe AI must be embedded, not bolted on. It has to live in the data, analytics and workflows your teams rely on every day. That’s the thinking behind Precision AI^®, and it’s why we built AI capabilities into our platform’s core.

Partners who treated AI as a platform capability rather than a standalone tool delivered some of the strongest outcomes for customers in 2025. They were able to meet customers’ needs and deliver business outcomes in a single, unified approach. They helped organizations:

• Detect and respond to threats faster with AI-assisted analytics.
• Use automation to streamline change, investigation and response workflows.
• Tie AI to tangible outcomes, such as reduced risk, higher productivity and a better user experience.

In 2026, we’ll double down on AI across the platform and invest in the tools, content and enablement you need to bring those capabilities to life. Our focus is on making it easier for you to build AI-powered services that are repeatable and aligned to the outcomes customers expect.

Upcoming program changes reflect that intent. We’ll promote next-generation security as a growth engine and invest in ways that strengthen partner profitability across consulting services, resale, quality delivery, technical support and managed security services.

3. Ensuring Our Ecosystem Can Be a Growth Engine for Everyone

As AI raised the bar for both attackers and defenders in 2025, the partners who leaned into platformization and outcome-driven services were the ones who helped customers stay ahead of the curve. Those successes are now shaping how we strengthen and scale the partner ecosystem in 2026.

Our ecosystem isn’t just a route to market; it’s intended to be an economic engine for everyone involved. This year, many partners grew their business by building practices around our platform and aligning their services with where customers needed the most support: strategy, implementation, optimization, ongoing operations. We saw especially strong momentum from partners’ expansions:

• Consulting and advisory services around zero trust and AI-driven transformation.
• Resale opportunities centered on platform consolidation and next-generation security.
• Quality delivery and technical support that keep deployments reliable and current.
• Managed security services that give customers 24/7 protection and expert oversight.

These achievements reflect the value exchange at the heart of our ecosystem. Palo Alto Networks invests in platformization, AI and enablement, while our partners bring delivery expertise, regional insight and service innovation. Together, we create outcomes neither of us could deliver alone.

In 2026, we plan to build on that momentum and drive even greater partner profitability. Program evolutions will focus on growth across the full lifecycle, from initial design and implementation to long-term operation and optimization. We’re also expanding collaboration with our technology alliances to build new joint offerings and solution plays that the ecosystem can take to market together.

When we combine our platform, your expertise and the capabilities of our Alliance partners, then customers gain more paths to adopt next-generation security with confidence, and you gain more opportunities to develop differentiated, high-value practices.

Keeping Customers at the Center

At the heart of every partner collaboration is the customer, of course. Everything we build, integrate and advance together starts and ends with protecting them. This year, ecosystem alignment delivered measurable impact for our customers across industries. When partners lead with integrated solutions anchored in our platform, organizations saw visible improvements:

• Faster deployment of secure solutions.
• Reduced complexity with unified visibility.
• Greater confidence in defending against today’s AI-driven threats.

We saw this firsthand in joint wins across cloud security transformations, zero trust modernization and AI-assisted threat detection. When our ecosystem moves together, customers can move faster, operate more securely and achieve meaningful outcomes. Customer success is the foundation of everything we do as a partner-led organization, and it will remain our North Star in 2026.

Partnering with Precision in 2026 and Beyond

What we learned and achieved together in 2025 points us toward a clear focus for 2026 to advance ecosystem-led innovation, so we can deliver outcomes that matter most to our customers.

With that mission in mind, we will focus on the following four priorities:

• Deeper Integration – Expanding API partnerships and strengthening interoperability across the platform.
• Co-Innovation – Enabling partners to build solutions tailored to industry needs and use cases.
• Empowered Enablement – Investing in learning, automation and AI capabilities that fuel differentiated, profitable services.
• Simplified Engagement – Streamlining programs and tools, so that partnering with us is faster and more rewarding.

These priorities highlight the real strength of our ecosystem: How platformization, AI and partner expertise come together to enable what we could not build alone.

Finally, to our partners and customers, thank you. Your trust, collaboration and commitment push us to innovate boldly and continuously. As we enter the new year, I’m excited about what we’ll build together. When we align our AI-powered platform, our partner programs and your expertise in delivery, services and managed security, we can deliver something far greater than a set of solutions.

We’re a powerful team that’s not just defending against what’s next; we’re defining the future of cybersecurity. And together, we’re unstoppable.

Partners, join us in shaping the next chapter of secure, AI-powered innovations. Connect with your Channel Business Manager to align on 2026 opportunities, upcoming program updates and ways we can elevate customer outcomes together. Visit the partner portal to learn more.

---

Key Takeaways

• Integration beats complexity.
  Unifying technology, data and expertise drove the strongest outcomes in 2025, helping partners reduce risk and accelerate time-to-value for customers.
• AI is a built-in advantage.
  By tapping into AI embedded across our cybersecurity platform, partners can address security and business outcomes simultaneously and deliver repeatable, profitable, AI-powered services.
• The partner ecosystem is a growth engine, and together, we’re unstoppable.
  Our 2026 priorities focus on deeper integration, coinnovation, empowered enablement and simplified engagement that drive partner profitability and stronger customer outcomes.

The post Partnering with Precision in 2026 appeared first on Palo Alto Networks Blog.

What It Means and How to Counter Autonomous Offensive Cyber Agents

For years, we've anticipated this day. With the release of Anthropic's landmark report (detailing the disruption of a cyberespionage operation orchestrated by AI agents with minimal human intervention), the reality of autonomous offensive cyber agents has moved from speculation to an active, machine-speed threat. The report covers their internal identification and analysis of artifacts from the GTG-1002 campaign, which was conducted against over 30 different enterprise targets. This event is independently being tracked in the AI Incident Database as incident 1263. To have a successful defense in the age of AI, we need an immediate shift from human-led, reactive security to a proactive, machine-driven security paradigm.

The GTG-1002 campaign is the first open report of an AI agent, powered by Claude Code, targeting multiple enterprise environments. Using Claude Code as the primary orchestration framework, the agent was effective in all key phases of the attack:

• Mapping attack surfaces without human guidance.
• Exploit vulnerabilities using custom code generation.
• Moving laterally by autonomously harvesting and testing credentials.
• Conducting an intelligence analysis to identify and prioritize high-value data, rather than just exfiltrating raw dumps.

It was a watershed moment for several key reasons:

• Stealth – Traffic analysis of the inputs and outputs to Claude Code were the initial indicators of this attack, however, the attack was only observable in aggregate.
• Self-Configuration – The agent autonomously adapted its attack strategy to achieve actions on an objective.
• Machine-Speed – The agent both orchestrated AND executed the campaign across all attack vectors.
• Autonomous Context and Persistence – Using structured markdown files, the execution agent maintained a persistent state of the attack, providing context and autonomous continuity between distributed sub-actions and attack phases.

This campaign, executed at “multiple operations per second,” marks the end of the necessity for the "human-in-the-loop” attacker and the arrival of the "human-on-the-loop" supervisor. Transitions between attack phases were controlled by the human to validate sufficient completion of the current phase before progressing. It was a thin layer of supervisory human control. With the whiplash pace of AI, defenders should anticipate the necessity of any human control to fade.

In the reported attack campaign, “commodity tools” were leveraged by the threat actor, which at first glance, may not seem particularly novel. However, the autonomous orchestration of these tools across multiple attack phases by Claude Code, using Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, represents a sophisticated technical advancement in offensive agents. Critically, this method improved more than just the speed of the attack, it also introduced the concept of autonomy with negligible human supervision, supporting dynamic and contextual reasoning in attack path planning across multiple target systems (even beyond typical human analyses, particularly for non-intuitive/interpretable event logging). Custom tools can bring very targeted actions within the same or similar offensive agent architectures, and defenders should be ready for this inevitable evolution.

We Need Agents to Fight Agents

With the debut of real-world offensive agent operations, it is now crystal clear: Defenders cannot combat autonomous, offensive AI with manual, static human driven security operations. Defenses must blend machine-speed responses with on-the-fly adaptability to maintain effectiveness against the self-optimizing campaigns now being observed. The pivot to autonomous agent-driven security operations will require transforming many elements of the traditional security operations lifecycle. All stages from preparation to response processes need to be resilient and robust to changes in adversary speed, stealth, evasion, orchestration frameworks and indicators of compromise.

Meeting the Challenges of Machine-Speed Defense Head-On

A new defense paradigm must be adopted to effectively combat AI attacks that are both orchestrated AND executed beyond human reaction time. To transform security operations and outpace AI-driven threats, organizations need to employ the following core principles:

• Precision of AI for Cybersecurity: Operating at machine speed requires precision and accuracy. Security systems must be capable of ingesting the right data, at the right time, and understanding the system context to detect and block threats in real-time, thwarting AI-generated attacks without generating erroneous alerts. Producing false positives is problematic at human speeds, and the problem compounds at machine speed.
• Proactive Cybersecurity for AI Systems: We must safeguard AI systems with real-time security solutions, preventing the models and applications from being directly or indirectly co-opted for malicious use. This demands a deep and continuous understanding of how AI agents might be abused via their application interfaces, permissions, provenance, identity and wider interactions across organizations.
• Transform Visibility into Observability: Visibility only encompasses a direct presence or absence. Observability is the combination of visibility plus some degree of cognitive and contextual reasoning. The visibility of a traffic sign does not guarantee a driver will observe and respond to it. The GTG-1002 attack evaded detection by splitting and distributing small, seemingly benign fragments of the full campaign across numerous sessions. The requests were visible, but the scope of the malicious campaign was not observed from the isolated requests. To identify and help stop such techniques, defenses need distributed observability, which can only be achieved from context-aware agents that understand the nature and impact of disparate events and can disrupt such attacks when they are identified.
• Agentic Security Operations: As an industry, we must also acknowledge the difference between autonomous and automated systems. The industry has been integrating elements of automation for years. Scripting, decision trees and playbooks are mechanisms for speeding up the response in specific context, but do not necessarily generalize or work across different phases. If the attacker is using an agentic system for 90% of the attack lifecycle, security operations centers (SOCs) must also implement an agentic system for 90% of their triage, investigation, remediation and threat hunting workflows. This must be the rule, rather than the exception. By combining observability with dynamic AI agents capable of coordinated decision making and task execution, SOCs can deliver proactive autonomous protection at scale.

The Future Is Now. Are You Ready?

The GTG-1002 campaign is a clear signal that offensive AI agents are being used in the wild. The adoption of AI agents by threat actors will accelerate and demand a decisive transformation of defensive security operations to include agent orchestration tools customized to respond to the uniqueness of offensive AI agents.

At Palo Alto Networks, our platformization strategy was built precisely for this moment. This interconnectivity between tools and systems transforms visibility into observability necessary for AI agent orchestration.

In light of GTG-1002, there is an unequivocal need for the security community to accelerate the pivot from automated to autonomous security operations. AI agents can quickly find and exploit vulnerabilities, moving stealthily across the attack chain. We must shift from human-led, reactive defense to fast, proactive machine-driven security to ensure cyber resilience in the age of AI.

Are you ready? Learn about securing AI agents and how to create a trustworthy AI ecosystem.

---

Key Takeaways

• Autonomous Orchestration and Execution: The GTG-1002 campaign was a watershed event because the AI agent, powered by Claude Code, autonomously orchestrated and executed all key phases of the attack, from mapping surfaces and exploiting vulnerabilities to moving laterally and conducting intelligence analysis at machine speed.
• Shift to Machine-Driven Security Paradigm: The emergence of autonomous offensive cyber agents, as demonstrated by the GTG-1002 campaign, demands an immediate pivot from human-led, reactive security to a proactive, machine-driven security defense model.
• Distributed Observability is Essential to Agentic Defenses: To counter new attack techniques like GTG-1002, which evade detection by splitting the campaign into small, distributed, and seemingly benign fragments, defenses must adopt distributed observability to connect disparate events using context-aware agents.

Further Reading:

• Lohn, Andrew, et al. "Autonomous Cyber Defense." A roadmap from lab to ops. Online. Centre for Emerging Technology and Security (CETaS) at The Alan Turing Institute (2023).
• Principles for the Secure Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Operational Technology

The post Crossing the Autonomy Threshold appeared first on Palo Alto Networks Blog.