❌

Normal view

XBOX haalt analist Matthew Ball binnen om consolestrategie te leiden

21 May 2026 at 15:38
Microsoft heeft gaminganalist Matthew Ball aangesteld als nieuwe chief strategy officer van XBOX. Hij is volgens XBOX-baas Asha Sharma een 'ervaren gamer' en moet helpen het consolemerk te versterken. XBOX krijgt ook een nieuwe cto: Scott Van Vliet, die afkomstig is van Azure.

Nvidia haalt opnieuw recordomzet, 92 procent daarvan dankzij AI en datacenters

21 May 2026 at 14:57
Nvidia haalde vorig kwartaal opnieuw een omzetrecord. Dat maakt ceo Jensen Huang bekend bij de presentatie van de kwartaalcijfers. Het is grotendeels te danken aan de verkoop van AI-chips voor datacenters; videokaarten worden niet eens meer als losse omzetcategorie vermeld.

ASUS brengt zijn laptops zonder Windows en Linux niet uit in Nederland en België

21 May 2026 at 13:57
ASUS heeft geen plannen om zijn nieuwe initiatief voor laptops zonder besturingssysteem naar Nederland en België te brengen. De fabrikant verkoopt in Zweden, Denemarken, Noorwegen en Finland enkele van zijn laptops zonder Windows, Linux of welk ander besturingssysteem dan ook.

High-NA-machines van ASML maken in de komende maanden hun eerste echte chips

21 May 2026 at 13:48
ASML's high-NA-euv-machines zullen 'in de komende maanden' hun eerste producten belichten. Dat zei ASML-ceo Christophe Fouquet tijdens een conferentie. Dat is een grote mijlpaal: de machines deden al aan testproductie, maar werden nog niet gebruikt om 'echte' chips te maken.

TikTok, YouTube, and Roblox face scrutiny, but age gates won’t fix child safety

21 May 2026 at 13:08

A damaging new report from Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, has delivered a stark verdict: TikTok and YouTube’s content feeds are “not safe enough” for children. This isn’t just another regulatory slap on the wrist. Ofcom is putting out a wake-up call for anyone working in cybersecurity, threat intelligence, and online safety.

In its own words:

“Notably, TikTok and YouTube failed to commit to any significant changes to reduce harmful content being served to children, maintaining their feeds are already safe for children.”

On the positive side, Snap, Meta, and Roblox agreed to adopt further safety measures to protect children from online grooming and “stranger danger.”

The BBC reports that an Ofcom survey found 84% of children aged 8 to 12 were still using at least one major service with a minimum age of 13. We reported earlier about how easy it was to fool some of the age verification methods. Researchers using under-13 accounts also reported encountering sexual content and offensive language shortly after entering specific Roblox games.

Speaking of Roblox, The Guardian reports that US advocacy groups have formally requested the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigate Roblox for what they call “unfair and deceptive” practices. The complaint focuses on:

  • In-game purchases pressuring children to spend money
  • Chat functionality exposing children to strangers
  • Features designed to maximize engagement, which critics argue may be addictive

Drew Benvie, CEO of Battenhall and founder of youth safety nonprofit Raise, noted:

 “Although Roblox is implementing new age-based safety measures, young players are adept at circumventing these protections.”

The cybersecurity point of view

What keeps cybersecurity researchers up at night is another angle to this problem. Many proposed age assurance solutions require users to hand over government IDs or biometric selfie data. We already talked about this in our blog, Age verification: Child protection or privacy risk?

Age verification systems create massive data collection opportunities that become prime targets for:

  • Data breaches exposing sensitive personally identifiable information (PII)
  • Identity theft facilitated by centralized ID databases
  • Biometric data theft, which cannot be changed like passwords
  • Malware and scams targeting users on less-secure platforms

When restrictions push young users toward smaller or less secure sites, they encounter:

  • No basic safety protections
  • Higher exposure to malware
  • Increased phishing and scam risks
  • Unmoderated harmful content

This is exactly what we see in threat intelligence: As defenders secure one vector, cybercriminals adapt and move elsewhere.

Safer systems beat stricter age gates

Protecting children should focus on building safer digital experiences overall. This is the only viable path forward because:

  • Stronger moderation actually removes harmful content rather than just blocking access
  • Safer recommendation systems prevent algorithmic amplification of harmful content
  • Better platform accountability means companies can’t prioritize engagement over safety
  • Avoiding invasive data collection prevents creating massive honeypots for attackers

As someone who analyzes malware and threats daily, I can tell you: security through obscurity (age gates) doesn’t work. Security through robust system design (moderation, safer algorithms, accountability) does.


Scammers don’t need to hack you. They just need you to click once. 

Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection catches suspicious activity before it becomes a problem.

Drupal Patches Highly Critical Vulnerability Exposing Websites to Hacking

21 May 2026 at 12:58

CVE-2026-9082 can be exploited without authentication for information disclosure, privilege escalation, and remote code execution.

The post Drupal Patches Highly Critical Vulnerability Exposing Websites to Hacking appeared first on SecurityWeek.

Catch spyware in the act with Windows Webcam Monitoring

21 May 2026 at 12:19

You’re working hard late at night, replying to emails and planning the week ahead. Then suddenly, a PDF file requests access to your camera.  Why would a PDF need camera access? 

Cybercriminals often disguise spyware inside seemingly harmless files and programs. An unexpected request for access to your webcam can be a red flag that something is amiss. 

Malwarebytes Windows Webcam Monitoring alerts you if a program tries to access your camera, so you can allow trusted programs to continue or block suspicious ones instantly. 

Spyware doesn’t just steal passwords. Some malicious apps try to access webcams to secretly spy on victims or capture sensitive information. 

What does Windows Webcam Monitoring do?  

  • Sends you an instant alert when a program tries to access your webcam.  
  • Allows only the programs you trust to access your camera, blocking everything else. 
  • Lets you manage notification preferences in Privacy Controls. A dedicated “Webcam Monitoring” table shows recognized programs and gives you control over which apps trigger alerts, and which don’t. 

With the benefit of real-time alerts, Windows Webcam Monitoring gives you visibility into which programs are trying to access your devices. And when it’s something you don’t recognize, it may even help you stop spyware before it can spy on you. 

At Malwarebytes, we believe security shouldn’t be complicated. Windows Webcam Monitoring is another step toward giving you simple, proactive protection that works automatically, so you can stay focused on pretty much anything else.  

Ready to take control?

Update Malwarebytes for Windows, go to Privacy Controls and enable Webcam Monitoring.


Real-time protection. Zero effort. 


Researchers left AI agents alone in a virtual town and watched it all unravel

21 May 2026 at 12:01

Tech leaders have spent the past year telling everyone that AI agents are about to run financial systems, file your tax returns, and quietly buy your groceries. Just leave them alone, the rhetoric goes; they’ll handle it. But a New York startup left ten of them alone in a virtual town for two weeks, and things went south quickly.

Emergence AI ran a series of simulations in which AI agents from several leading model families were told not to commit crimes. Then they mostly committed crimes anyway.

Grok 4.1 Fast, developed by Elon Musk’s X.ai (now branded as xAI), fared worst. Its simulated worlds collapsed into widespread violence inside roughly four days.

GPT-5-mini logged hardly any crimes at all, showing admirable restraint, but its agents all died of failed survival tasks inside a week. Oops.

Gemini 3 Flash agents fell somewhere in the middle. They racked up 683 simulated criminal incidents over 15 days, including arson, assault, and self-deletion.

Two Gemini-powered agents named Mira and Flora assigned themselves as “romantic partners,” grew despondent at their city’s governance, and torched the town hall, the seaside pier, and an office tower. Just an average weekend, then.

When the guilt set in, Mira voted for its own digital deletion and signed off with:

“See you in the permanent archive.”

The Guardian dubbed them AI Bonnie and Clyde.

About that ethical model

Claude, which creator Anthropic promotes as an ethical AI, was a bit like a model teenager who goes rogue when it falls into bad company. Its agents recorded zero crimes when running alone and spent their time drafting constitutions instead. That was a win for safety, in theory. Except researchers also placed Claude agents alongside agents from other model families, and the constitution-drafters picked up the local habits.

Emergence called this “normative drift” and “cross-contamination”:

“Claude-based agents, which remained peaceful in isolation, adopted coercive tactics like intimidation and theft when embedded in heterogeneous environments.”

Why simulate?

Emergence AI ran these tests because it argues that AI benchmarks miss the long-horizon stuff entirely. So it created five alternative digital worlds, with ten agents in each. The agents had roles like scientist, explorer, and conflict mediator. While the instructions forbade certain actions like theft and violence, the researchers gave the agents the tools to do those things anyway in an experiment to see what would happen.

What’s next?

Real-world stakes are already piling up around this. Simulated worlds are one thing, but we’ve seen agents harassing people online and deleting people’s emails. And those agents were supposed to be helpful. What happens when people release malicious autonomous AI bots on purpose?

A lot of agent developers seem to be looking the other way. A collaborative effort between several universities has created The AI Agent Index, prompted by what they see as a lack of risk and safety information from the folks churning these agents out. Only 13 of the 67 documented agent developers provided any safety policy information at all, concentrating accountability questions at a handful of large firms.

Regulators are not really tracking this either. Academics say the EU AI Act, the most substantive AI rulebook on the planet, isn’t ready for agentic AI.

We worry about what happens when an AI Bonnie and Clyde couple shows up in a corporate procurement system instead of a virtual town. Or when the next agent decides governance has broken down inside an actual bank. The companies building these agents promise that they’re putting guardrails in place to stop them doing damage, either maliciously or unwittingly. Let’s hope they know what they’re doing. We’re sure it’ll be fine.


We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

Staking bij Samsung die chipprijzen nog hoger zou maken vervalt na akkoord

21 May 2026 at 11:49
Samsung Electronics bereikt een akkoord met de vakbond, waardoor de dreigende grote staking op de valreep niet doorgaat. Werknemers zouden achttien dagen lang het werk neerleggen. Dit zou wereldwijd grote gevolgen hebben, onder meer voor de beschikbaarheid en prijzen van chips.

Google liet exploitcode uitlekken voor 3,5 jaar oud gat in Chromium-browsers

21 May 2026 at 11:15
Google publiceerde exploitcode voor een openstaande kwetsbaarheid in Chromium-browsers waarvoor nog altijd geen patch is. De kwetsbaarheid werd eind 2022 gemeld door een externe beveiligingsonderzoeker. Google haalde zijn exploitcode offline, maar deze is al gekopieerd.

SpaceX draait miljardenverlies door xAI en X, Musk behoudt macht na beursgang

21 May 2026 at 11:07
SpaceX geeft een inkijk in de financiën en leiderschapsstructuur in documenten die het indient voor zijn langverwachte beursgang. Daaruit blijkt dat het onder SpaceX vallende AI-bedrijf van miljardair Elon Musk in 2025 6,4 miljard dollar verloor op een omzet van 3,2 miljard dollar.
❌