❌

Normal view

Received β€” 28 October 2026 ⏭ Black Hills Information Security, Inc.

Forensic Data: How to Acquire and Retain Vital Evidence

While "digital forensics" and "incident response" often appear together (as in the acronym "DFIR"), they represent two distinct disciplines.

What's in a Name?

The American Heritage Dictionary defines forensics as "The use of science and technology to investigate and establish facts in criminal or civil courts of law."

Contrast this with IBM's definition of incident response: "Incident response [...] refers to an organization's processes and technologies for detecting and responding to cyberthreats, security breaches or cyberattacks." Note the absence of any reference to legal proceedingsβ€”it simply describes the process by which an organization detects, halts, and recovers from an incident.

Legal Considerations

Although most incidents never end up in court, all should be treated as if they might.

Taking the proper steps before, during, and after response ensures that any data collected can be admissible as evidence.

It's important to know the rules of evidence for relevant jurisdictions. Global corporations should consider each jurisdiction they have locations in when developing standard operating procedures (SOPs). Always include legal counsel when developing your organization's SOPs.

Data Preservation

A common rule for digital evidence is the retention of data in its "original state." This is accomplished by using validated hardware and software to create an exact bit-for-bit copy of a piece of digital media. Yet during incident response, it is rare that full forensic images are createdβ€”typically, only a small subset of data is collected from victim devices for analysis. Before any action is taken, consult legal advisors to decide whether to collect full forensic images.

A good practice is to create a folder for the original data, generate and document a hash of its contents, and then create a working copy in a separate folder. Only perform analysis on the working copies of your data to preserve the integrity of the original data.

Documentation

Documentation is critical when handling potential evidence. A chain of custody (CoC) records details about what the data is, where it came from, who collected it, whom it was transferred to, a brief description of what was done to it, and so forth.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides a sample CoC here:
https://www.nist.gov/document/sample-chain-custody-formdocx

Each person working with the data must keep detailed notes: record dates, times, and any actions taken. Binary files often need to be parsed by special tools to make their data human-readableβ€”include any tool names and versions. The same should be done with human-readable data, such as text-based log files. While you likely don't need to document the version of Excel used to read a log file, if you added a column to show UTC date/time stamps in local time, that is worth noting.

The gold standard for documentation is this: notes should be detailed enough that someone with a similar background can recreate your steps and produce the same results.

This is the scientific method part of digital forensics. Processes need to be repeatable and generate the same results.

Tool Validation Procedures

Before an incident occurs, verify that your hardware and software are working. Test write blockers to ensure they do not alter the evidentiary media. Validate that your forensic software functions correctly (it's not unheard of for new versions to report the wrong date/time stamps when parsing binary data).

While there is no set standard for validation processes, some guidelines exist to help you develop validation SOPs.

Validation SOPs guidelines:
NIST: https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/nist-cftt-reports
SWGDE: http://cet4861.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/120024474/4861.2014-09-05_SWGDE_Recommended_Guidelines_for_Validation_Testing_V2-0.pdf

Additional Considerations for Incident Handling

When managing incidents, also consider:

  • What are the data retention policies of your Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools?
  • How is your cloud data preserved?
  • Who has access to sensitive or personal data?

These factors often depend on your license agreement with providers. Make sure data can be maintained in a secure, long-term manner, as it can take years until an incident makes it into the courtroom. Implement processes to export incident data from systems and services while preserving integrity and meeting long-term storage requirements that protect its availability and confidentiality. Access to confidential information must always be managed carefully.

Remember: Involve your legal team, validate your tools, work from copies (never original data), document everything meticulously, and maintain chain of custody.

Received β€” 3 August 2026 ⏭ Black Hills Information Security, Inc.

KAPE 101: A Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor Cheatsheet

Spend time performing forensic analysis on the Windows Operating System and you'll see a host of artifacts that can be used to identify adversary activity. From changes to the registry to the System Resource Utilization Monitor, Windows artifacts run deep. The challenge is locating, extracting, and parsing these artifacts in an efficient manner.

The post KAPE 101: A Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor Cheatsheet appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

Received β€” 10 July 2026 ⏭ Black Hills Information Security, Inc.

Finding the β€œGoldilocks” Zone: A Practical Approach to Alert Triage

We're all petrified about missing a critical event or misclassifying an alert, but when we're talking about incident response (IR), there are often hundreds if not thousands of alerts to parse through. It's easy to get caught up with one alert because it feels "too hot" or maybe not spend enough time looking into something that initially seems "too cold."

The post Finding the β€œGoldilocks” Zone: A Practical Approach to Alert Triage appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

Received β€” 11 January 2026 ⏭ Black Hills Information Security, Inc.

The Curious Case of theΒ Comburglar

By: BHIS
18 December 2025 at 18:55

By Troy Wojewoda During a recent Breach Assessment engagement, BHIS discovered a highly stealthy and persistent intrusion technique utilized by a threat actor to maintain Command-and-Control (C2) within the client’s […]

The post The Curious Case of theΒ Comburglar appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

Webcast: Attack Tactics 7 – The Logs You Are Looking For

Slides for this webcast can be found here: https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/SLIDES_AttackTactics7LogsYouAreLookingFor.pdf So we went through an attack in the BHIS Webcast, β€œAttack Tactics 5! Zero to Hero Attack.” Then we went through […]

The post Webcast: Attack Tactics 7 – The Logs You Are Looking For appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

WEBCAST: Cubicles and Compromises

By: BHIS
25 January 2018 at 17:08

John Strand// Here’s a live demo of John’s recent blog post that talked about gamifying your table top Dungeon and Dragons style. Join John, Kent, Jordan and Sierra as they […]

The post WEBCAST: Cubicles and Compromises appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

Cubicles and Compromises Printable

By: BHIS
23 January 2018 at 18:46

Cubicles and Compromises

John Strand// Thanks for joining us for our Cubicles and Compromises webcast! We also have a recording available soon! In the meantime, here’s a blog post explanation: And, here you’ll […]

The post Cubicles and Compromises Printable appeared first on Black Hills Information Security, Inc..

❌